{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU","short_pith_number":"pith:L2RDSE7X","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5ea23913f7a7ea9996a5913820e9386d2d96b2f855ce76f81e7e950a2a26bde4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.04685","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Generative Large Language Model usage in Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Jiangshan Yu, Joseph K. Liu, Peter Ince, Xiaoning Du","submitted_at":"2025-04-07T02:33:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent years have seen an explosion of activity in Generative AI, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), revolutionising applications across various fields. Smart contract vulnerability detection is no exception; as smart contracts exist on public chains and can have billions of dollars transacted daily, continuous improvement in vulnerability detection is crucial. This has led to many researchers investigating the usage of generative large language models (LLMs) to aid in detecting vulnerabilities in smart contracts.\n  This paper presents a systematic review of the current LLM-based smart"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.04685","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2025-04-07T02:33:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d2f71e829d30276f8bde8bd1ce2a85c2e194c1e25a30b852df3453aa1796c440","abstract_canon_sha256":"ca4054eb8937da9c29aa77066a74e2d20e9bcb597d28831f69bde7f7ecc78eae"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.461053Z","signature_b64":"7QslyZWw2tjIyiMytiD/8+pQ6mgvejtRKBZCFekja3rk/x0vCvVIuyw10UGzCrx+FIhoLDZkS/zq8uGtce6LAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5ea23913f7a7ea9996a5913820e9386d2d96b2f855ce76f81e7e950a2a26bde4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.460576Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.460576Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Generative Large Language Model usage in Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Jiangshan Yu, Joseph K. Liu, Peter Ince, Xiaoning Du","submitted_at":"2025-04-07T02:33:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent years have seen an explosion of activity in Generative AI, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), revolutionising applications across various fields. Smart contract vulnerability detection is no exception; as smart contracts exist on public chains and can have billions of dollars transacted daily, continuous improvement in vulnerability detection is crucial. This has led to many researchers investigating the usage of generative large language models (LLMs) to aid in detecting vulnerabilities in smart contracts.\n  This paper presents a systematic review of the current LLM-based smart"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.04685","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.04685/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.04685","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.460634+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.04685v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.460634+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.04685","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.460634+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"L2RDSE7XU7VJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.460634+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVF","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.460634+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"L2RDSE7X","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.460634+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.04418","citing_title":"SPEAR: An Engineering Case Study of Multi-Agent Coordination for Smart Contract Auditing","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L2RDSE7X"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L2RDSE7X","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.04685&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/L2RDSE7XU7VJTFVFSE4CB2JYNU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.460634+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:28.460634+00:00"}