{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS","short_pith_number":"pith:L3DJOOBW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5ec697383645e3b101749c409528da9caee676ec179a7803f498d7967557a262","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1712.04802","version":8},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Fisher-Schultz Lecture: Generic Machine Learning Inference on Heterogenous Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments, with an Application to Immunization in India","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.EM","math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Esther Duflo, Iv\\'an Fern\\'andez-Val, Mert Demirer, Victor Chernozhukov","submitted_at":"2017-12-13T14:47:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"We propose strategies to estimate and make inference on key features of heterogeneous effects in randomized experiments. These key features include best linear predictors of the effects using machine learning proxies, average effects sorted by impact groups, and average characteristics of most and least impacted units. The approach is valid in high dimensional settings, where the effects are proxied (but not necessarily consistently estimated) by predictive and causal machine learning methods. We post-process these proxies into estimates of the key features. Our approach is generic, it can be "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1712.04802","kind":"arxiv","version":8},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2017-12-13T14:47:57Z","cross_cats_sorted":["econ.EM","math.ST","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"48be1cd9d4d0eff5220e3bef75cee8b78cdafcbe23679ab4bbc111f6dc1fe892","abstract_canon_sha256":"b4b21540d6a3a99d4dba3a0ffda540128fe8c9ccb1a35b5925b02bdd441cc6df"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.623051Z","signature_b64":"QzkB0HnY2FJQfvfVkxJFvgcTe+ataVqThQWq5SYP/iqzDW7CKNq9lrygj3/4SJB6SYoR18v0Lirf9rrklq/ZDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5ec697383645e3b101749c409528da9caee676ec179a7803f498d7967557a262","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.622558Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.622558Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Fisher-Schultz Lecture: Generic Machine Learning Inference on Heterogenous Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments, with an Application to Immunization in India","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.EM","math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Esther Duflo, Iv\\'an Fern\\'andez-Val, Mert Demirer, Victor Chernozhukov","submitted_at":"2017-12-13T14:47:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"We propose strategies to estimate and make inference on key features of heterogeneous effects in randomized experiments. These key features include best linear predictors of the effects using machine learning proxies, average effects sorted by impact groups, and average characteristics of most and least impacted units. The approach is valid in high dimensional settings, where the effects are proxied (but not necessarily consistently estimated) by predictive and causal machine learning methods. We post-process these proxies into estimates of the key features. Our approach is generic, it can be "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1712.04802","kind":"arxiv","version":8},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1712.04802/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1712.04802","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.622616+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1712.04802v8","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.622616+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1712.04802","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.622616+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"L3DJOOBWIXR3","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.622616+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"L3DJOOBWIXR3CALU","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.622616+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"L3DJOOBW","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.622616+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.08324","citing_title":"Shared-Donor Inference for Heterogeneity in Many-Group Synthetic Difference-in-Differences","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15373","citing_title":"Nonparametric inference for sublevel-set probabilities of conditional average treatment effect functions","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20045","citing_title":"A general nonparametric framework for testing hypotheses about function-valued parameters","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L3DJOOBW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L3DJOOBW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1712.04802&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/L3DJOOBWIXR3CALUTRAJKKG2TS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.622616+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:07.622616+00:00"}