{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC","short_pith_number":"pith:L4WNHKGX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5f2cd3a8d76195703d61aa2622176608802caaa05b97d5ed2fdfb9ef6f106ea3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2509.06858","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Disentangling Interaction and Bias Effects in Opinion Dynamics of Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","nlin.AO"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"David A. Ehrlich, Vincent C. Brockers, Viola Priesemann","submitted_at":"2025-09-08T16:26:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models are increasingly used to simulate human opinion dynamics, yet the effect of genuine interaction is often obscured by systematic biases. We develop a Bayesian framework to disentangle and quantify three such biases: (i) A topic bias toward the LLM's default stance; (ii) an agreement bias favoring agreement to the prompted statement irrespective of the question; and (iii) an anchoring bias toward the initiating agent's stance. We apply this framework to various LLMs that performed multi-step dialogues on 12 different questions from climate change and societal justice to mus"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2509.06858","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","submitted_at":"2025-09-08T16:26:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","nlin.AO"],"title_canon_sha256":"21e60c229ce20b9eb52fbe3422b07d082e4a81e9ce6db37319d8ae291c4db347","abstract_canon_sha256":"e1a92d029ba6c879b64984b682322cb73f1dfcc06c1b0cecd72de0bbfef94fb0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.788430Z","signature_b64":"qy6zb8E/fOHs6T4DKb91M7TpMAzk1MHlpfjHIsThQG+uzOeJRhC28h7UGo/G+N/VPRSKIELnNNI9ychtRkGkDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5f2cd3a8d76195703d61aa2622176608802caaa05b97d5ed2fdfb9ef6f106ea3","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.787522Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.787522Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Disentangling Interaction and Bias Effects in Opinion Dynamics of Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","nlin.AO"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"David A. Ehrlich, Vincent C. Brockers, Viola Priesemann","submitted_at":"2025-09-08T16:26:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models are increasingly used to simulate human opinion dynamics, yet the effect of genuine interaction is often obscured by systematic biases. We develop a Bayesian framework to disentangle and quantify three such biases: (i) A topic bias toward the LLM's default stance; (ii) an agreement bias favoring agreement to the prompted statement irrespective of the question; and (iii) an anchoring bias toward the initiating agent's stance. We apply this framework to various LLMs that performed multi-step dialogues on 12 different questions from climate change and societal justice to mus"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2509.06858","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2509.06858/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2509.06858","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.787625+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2509.06858v2","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.787625+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.06858","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.787625+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"L4WNHKGXMGKX","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.787625+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLB","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.787625+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"L4WNHKGX","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.787625+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15956","citing_title":"TeraGram: A Structured Longitudinal Dataset of the Telegram Messenger","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10721","citing_title":"Conformity Generates Collective Misalignment in AI Agents Societies","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L4WNHKGX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L4WNHKGX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2509.06858&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/L4WNHKGXMGKXAPLBVITCEF3GBC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.787625+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-25T02:02:08.787625+00:00"}