{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD","short_pith_number":"pith:L5D4NURH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5f47c6d227bbc3de1222381824ff4430e7df89fa4b039d6e17ef4692a544d8af","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.03906","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Puzzle About General Covariance and Gauge","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"Eleanor March, James Owen Weatherall","submitted_at":"2024-05-06T23:43:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider two simple criteria for when a physical theory should be said to be \"generally covariant\", and we argue that these criteria are not met by Yang-Mills theory, even on geometric formulations of that theory. The reason, we show, is that the bundles encountered in Yang-Mills theory are not natural bundles; instead, they are gauge-natural. We then show how these observations relate to previous arguments about the significance of solder forms in assessing disanalogies between general relativity and Yang-Mills theory. We conclude by suggesting that general covariance is really about funct"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.03906","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","submitted_at":"2024-05-06T23:43:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"bd91076aec9572e6459988adce93b05bbba4ffc07dcdca890fcbfefaa861cd96","abstract_canon_sha256":"88742b14500ffa76f3b87ff6c0a5ac23d08fa009bd0b6716eebc76a409879059"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.856344Z","signature_b64":"7XET/eST2uK8qS9MRBb2p0A91PEkPx1z1kyzZSpRKG/dEDeF/0EorRaaBsxWIopAYZWPelRnkXKpiI0aYkNiDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5f47c6d227bbc3de1222381824ff4430e7df89fa4b039d6e17ef4692a544d8af","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.855826Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.855826Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Puzzle About General Covariance and Gauge","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"Eleanor March, James Owen Weatherall","submitted_at":"2024-05-06T23:43:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider two simple criteria for when a physical theory should be said to be \"generally covariant\", and we argue that these criteria are not met by Yang-Mills theory, even on geometric formulations of that theory. The reason, we show, is that the bundles encountered in Yang-Mills theory are not natural bundles; instead, they are gauge-natural. We then show how these observations relate to previous arguments about the significance of solder forms in assessing disanalogies between general relativity and Yang-Mills theory. We conclude by suggesting that general covariance is really about funct"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.03906","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.03906/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.03906","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.855901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.03906v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.855901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.03906","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.855901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"L5D4NURHXPB5","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.855901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"L5D4NURHXPB54ERC","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.855901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"L5D4NURH","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.855901+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.14062","citing_title":"Nontrivial constitutive laws and unified structures in constrained BF theory","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L5D4NURH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L5D4NURH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.03906&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/L5D4NURHXPB54ERCHAMCJ72EGD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.855901+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:20.855901+00:00"}