{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP","short_pith_number":"pith:L742ONVA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5ff9a736a0989190c1da8b5f1451a67bfc999786b97c74f88210e28faf63dc7d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2312.06077","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"An Ambiguity Measure for Recognizing the Unknowns in Deep Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Roozbeh Yousefzadeh","submitted_at":"2023-12-11T02:57:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study the understanding of deep neural networks from the scope in which they are trained on. While the accuracy of these models is usually impressive on the aggregate level, they still make mistakes, sometimes on cases that appear to be trivial. Moreover, these models are not reliable in realizing what they do not know leading to failures such as adversarial vulnerability and out-of-distribution failures. Here, we propose a measure for quantifying the ambiguity of inputs for any given model with regard to the scope of its training. We define the ambiguity based on the geometric arrangements"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2312.06077","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2023-12-11T02:57:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"68417a970da6603d240285a9f040acb1e07b40a6f0e69a5835fc840f9a934593","abstract_canon_sha256":"af655fe2fb493c29ee15cf616d71f81df9795136632e8db85d0629581072879b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.208285Z","signature_b64":"RRL3HY0JhH1lAKBaS+zhTcocmDEVPeq6bQUDsjFT4VzmanH80b4hpiRaFbubz6YXdKk4gY2nTsFbFvuhGrogDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5ff9a736a0989190c1da8b5f1451a67bfc999786b97c74f88210e28faf63dc7d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.207781Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.207781Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"An Ambiguity Measure for Recognizing the Unknowns in Deep Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Roozbeh Yousefzadeh","submitted_at":"2023-12-11T02:57:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study the understanding of deep neural networks from the scope in which they are trained on. While the accuracy of these models is usually impressive on the aggregate level, they still make mistakes, sometimes on cases that appear to be trivial. Moreover, these models are not reliable in realizing what they do not know leading to failures such as adversarial vulnerability and out-of-distribution failures. Here, we propose a measure for quantifying the ambiguity of inputs for any given model with regard to the scope of its training. We define the ambiguity based on the geometric arrangements"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2312.06077","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2312.06077/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2312.06077","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.207853+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2312.06077v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.207853+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2312.06077","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.207853+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"L742ONVATCIZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.207853+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"L742ONVATCIZBQO2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.207853+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"L742ONVA","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.207853+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.11541","citing_title":"Robust Ambiguity Detection (RAD) From Model- and Feature-Space Consistency","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L742ONVA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L742ONVA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2312.06077&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/L742ONVATCIZBQO2RNPRIUNGPP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.207853+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:22:38.207853+00:00"}