{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX","short_pith_number":"pith:L7ZCLAU6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5ff225829e9c1efc316e102803d16915e0bf2e6a239e3d7944a695f0ba551205","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.19042","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantum Error Correction and Dynamical Decoupling: Better Together or Apart?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Arian Vezvaee, Daniel A. Lidar, Mario Morford-Oberst, Victor Kasatkin","submitted_at":"2026-02-22T04:35:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantum error correction/detection (QEC/QED) and dynamical decoupling (DD) are tools for protecting quantum information. A natural goal is to combine them to outperform either approach alone. Such a benefit is not automatic: physical DD can conflict with encoded subspace, and QEC performance is governed by the errors that survive decoding, not just those DD suppresses. We analyze a hybrid memory cycle where DD is implemented logically (LDD) using normalizer elements of an $[[n,k,d]]$ stabilizer code, followed by a round of syndrome measurement and recovery (or, in the detection setting, postse"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.19042","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2026-02-22T04:35:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"cc6a33153ba5515ff2fe03fd96d1127ed94eaf75e3377d1ec0aeb4be58d8ce4c","abstract_canon_sha256":"2525f7972dce9a64f9e625358ad379f06a15f2b826202524708c9ea3d4d78c85"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.855642Z","signature_b64":"e09kqlyrs/aARhFDNwZuN4imSAklpsCvyFnEPcYK/ohiLC69hmxvUen9vBYXRQT3BYjWcRCeHnkM0nlzXXgyDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5ff225829e9c1efc316e102803d16915e0bf2e6a239e3d7944a695f0ba551205","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.854693Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.854693Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantum Error Correction and Dynamical Decoupling: Better Together or Apart?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Arian Vezvaee, Daniel A. Lidar, Mario Morford-Oberst, Victor Kasatkin","submitted_at":"2026-02-22T04:35:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantum error correction/detection (QEC/QED) and dynamical decoupling (DD) are tools for protecting quantum information. A natural goal is to combine them to outperform either approach alone. Such a benefit is not automatic: physical DD can conflict with encoded subspace, and QEC performance is governed by the errors that survive decoding, not just those DD suppresses. We analyze a hybrid memory cycle where DD is implemented logically (LDD) using normalizer elements of an $[[n,k,d]]$ stabilizer code, followed by a round of syndrome measurement and recovery (or, in the detection setting, postse"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2602.19042","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.19042/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.19042","created_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.855138+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.19042v3","created_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.855138+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.19042","created_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.855138+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"L7ZCLAU6TQPP","created_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.855138+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLO","created_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.855138+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"L7ZCLAU6","created_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.855138+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11496","citing_title":"Logical error estimation from syndrome data of surface-code experiments","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05871","citing_title":"Dynamical decoupling and quantum error correction with SU(d) symmetries","ref_index":91,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L7ZCLAU6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L7ZCLAU6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.19042&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/L7ZCLAU6TQPPYMLOCAUAHULJCX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.855138+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-14T00:18:23.855138+00:00"}