{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV","short_pith_number":"pith:LALUBMKH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"581740b147194fcd2e95737a4491da555f49ee384825c02213a658cdc5c2aa9f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2205.08448","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Assessing the model waveform accuracy of gravitational waves","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"John Veitch, Qian Hu","submitted_at":"2022-05-17T15:49:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the improvement in sensitivity of gravitational wave (GW) detectors and the increasing diversity of GW sources, there is a strong need for accurate GW waveform models for data analysis. While the current model accuracy assessments require waveforms generated by numerical relativity (NR) simulations as the \"true waveforms\", in this paper we propose an assessment approach that does not require NR simulations, which enables us to assess model accuracy everywhere in the parameter space. By measuring the difference between two waveform models, we derive a necessary condition for a pair of wave"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2205.08448","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2022-05-17T15:49:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b6c7840bf514a43fd9947d03d91fd0aac3bf7aa408c6131f3fc1ca84f8f07812","abstract_canon_sha256":"41e7ad9d1014fbad3d283051d3dbe89e5d89f2f207a451c9a0161ff1e835ff8e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370503Z","signature_b64":"TVCFHLNuXCveCviGFr7XC6C+Mzxb/Txu74UDIg/+Pmx/MVJ/ZtiAw4eRnZR0e8PnvkM1QPs7cQDDN9oDmpFkAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"581740b147194fcd2e95737a4491da555f49ee384825c02213a658cdc5c2aa9f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370088Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370088Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Assessing the model waveform accuracy of gravitational waves","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"John Veitch, Qian Hu","submitted_at":"2022-05-17T15:49:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the improvement in sensitivity of gravitational wave (GW) detectors and the increasing diversity of GW sources, there is a strong need for accurate GW waveform models for data analysis. While the current model accuracy assessments require waveforms generated by numerical relativity (NR) simulations as the \"true waveforms\", in this paper we propose an assessment approach that does not require NR simulations, which enables us to assess model accuracy everywhere in the parameter space. By measuring the difference between two waveform models, we derive a necessary condition for a pair of wave"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2205.08448","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2205.08448/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2205.08448","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370142+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2205.08448v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370142+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2205.08448","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370142+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LALUBMKHDFH4","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370142+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LALUBMKHDFH42LUV","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370142+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LALUBMKH","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370142+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.24816","citing_title":"The Bondi--Sachs gauge, BMS frames, and memory in black hole perturbation theory","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28937","citing_title":"Quadrupole and quadratic-in-spin effects in quasicircular, spinning, asymmetric binaries","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21859","citing_title":"Mitigating Systematic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21859","citing_title":"Mitigating Systematic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.14134","citing_title":"All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential","ref_index":89,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LALUBMKH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LALUBMKH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2205.08448&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LALUBMKHDFH42LUVON5EJEO2KV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370142+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:49:53.370142+00:00"}