{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H","short_pith_number":"pith:LASXUZBY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"58257a64380879fa729777267debe2d9e5e11bf417c11fcc1e389e75e431cdee","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.11176","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Cheng Li, Ke Wang, Sujian Li, Weimin Xiong, Wei Peng, Wenhao Wu, Xiutian Zhao, Xun Wang, Yifan Song","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T03:29:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language model agents have exhibited exceptional performance across a range of complex interactive tasks. Recent approaches have utilized tuning with expert trajectories to enhance agent performance, yet they primarily concentrate on outcome rewards, which may lead to errors or suboptimal actions due to the absence of process supervision signals. In this paper, we introduce the Iterative step-level Process Refinement (IPR) framework, which provides detailed step-by-step guidance to enhance agent training. Specifically, we adopt the Monte Carlo method to estimate step-level rewards. Durin"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.11176","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T03:29:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"320ded1f74e384bb2eb8a7957228ecc69b270e3cb930e1f79a97b6c42afe61ef","abstract_canon_sha256":"3a8b19f145027514fc1cfe5e484e1876ccb45ce352fc6f68b65766c2e7065504"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.890014Z","signature_b64":"CSsHzjTHzdFCIDLHp01nP4K7EyIAjy4ajChzmPJ3IEfHIBO32I6q3+LFebxY61CLBoWU/vrTDxoWIo5PSurtDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"58257a64380879fa729777267debe2d9e5e11bf417c11fcc1e389e75e431cdee","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.889463Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.889463Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Cheng Li, Ke Wang, Sujian Li, Weimin Xiong, Wei Peng, Wenhao Wu, Xiutian Zhao, Xun Wang, Yifan Song","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T03:29:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language model agents have exhibited exceptional performance across a range of complex interactive tasks. Recent approaches have utilized tuning with expert trajectories to enhance agent performance, yet they primarily concentrate on outcome rewards, which may lead to errors or suboptimal actions due to the absence of process supervision signals. In this paper, we introduce the Iterative step-level Process Refinement (IPR) framework, which provides detailed step-by-step guidance to enhance agent training. Specifically, we adopt the Monte Carlo method to estimate step-level rewards. Durin"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.11176","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.11176/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.11176","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.889521+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.11176v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.889521+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.11176","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.889521+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LASXUZBYBB47","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.889521+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LASXUZBYBB47U4UX","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.889521+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LASXUZBY","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.889521+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.27369","citing_title":"Reinforcement Learning without Ground-Truth Solutions can Improve LLMs","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.22385","citing_title":"MetaPS: Adaptive Programmatic Strategy Selection for Market Agents","ref_index":74,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20061","citing_title":"Rewarding Beliefs, Not Actions: Consistency-Guided Credit Assignment for Long-Horizon Agents","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23194","citing_title":"From Coarse to Fine: Self-Adaptive Hierarchical Planning for LLM Agents","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LASXUZBY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LASXUZBY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.11176&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LASXUZBYBB47U4UXO4TH327C3H/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.889521+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:26.889521+00:00"}