{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ","short_pith_number":"pith:LBBI6EBE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"58428f102490e056e7b502b6fd2d272a446f498f1bd5891b49f07cca3fe84df7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.00322","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bias in Opinion Summarisation from Pre-training to Adaptation: A Case Study in Political Bias","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Haytham Fayek, Nannan Huang, Xiuzhen Zhang","submitted_at":"2024-02-01T04:15:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Opinion summarisation aims to summarise the salient information and opinions presented in documents such as product reviews, discussion forums, and social media texts into short summaries that enable users to effectively understand the opinions therein. Generating biased summaries has the risk of potentially swaying public opinion. Previous studies focused on studying bias in opinion summarisation using extractive models, but limited research has paid attention to abstractive summarisation models. In this study, using political bias as a case study, we first establish a methodology to quantify"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.00322","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-02-01T04:15:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d3555106d6fedd8acea2917fc21d16965aa50e1d1d925ebe2e17ac2aaa3c5631","abstract_canon_sha256":"2d0ad2b7587a00da859f109eb0a7a3e5cc3507966d54c6a308f306e2f1251a59"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062537Z","signature_b64":"Tu8CxMY7EJPA2KGsptWIrSkVFa/SsRbNz3X/AWKVGAB+yc/0KSL/z2XTiMpPaPPksQXFypRFXHA3wzTi0JihCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"58428f102490e056e7b502b6fd2d272a446f498f1bd5891b49f07cca3fe84df7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062031Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062031Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bias in Opinion Summarisation from Pre-training to Adaptation: A Case Study in Political Bias","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Haytham Fayek, Nannan Huang, Xiuzhen Zhang","submitted_at":"2024-02-01T04:15:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Opinion summarisation aims to summarise the salient information and opinions presented in documents such as product reviews, discussion forums, and social media texts into short summaries that enable users to effectively understand the opinions therein. Generating biased summaries has the risk of potentially swaying public opinion. Previous studies focused on studying bias in opinion summarisation using extractive models, but limited research has paid attention to abstractive summarisation models. In this study, using political bias as a case study, we first establish a methodology to quantify"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.00322","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.00322/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.00322","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.00322v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.00322","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LBBI6EBESDQF","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5V","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LBBI6EBE","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062092+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.07479","citing_title":"Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LBBI6EBE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LBBI6EBE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.00322&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LBBI6EBESDQFNZ5VAK3P2LJHFJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062092+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:40:10.062092+00:00"}