{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL","short_pith_number":"pith:LBJD7KN5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"58523fa9bdb65d403f275831266f5222fda5c9cc6ac823ff5461adb5c12ba1bd","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1708.08001","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Solved problems and remaining challenges for Granger causality analysis in neuroscience: A response to Stokes and Purdon (2017)","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Adam B. Barrett, Anil K. Seth, Lionel Barnett","submitted_at":"2017-08-26T17:49:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"Granger-Geweke causality (GGC) is a powerful and popular method for identifying directed functional (`causal') connectivity in neuroscience. In a recent paper, Stokes and Purdon [1] raise several concerns about its use. They make two primary claims: (1) that GGC estimates may be severely biased or of high variance, and (2) that GGC fails to reveal the full structural/causal mechanisms of a system. However, these claims rest, respectively, on an incomplete evaluation of the literature, and a misconception about what GGC can be said to measure. Here we explain how existing approaches (as impleme"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1708.08001","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2017-08-26T17:49:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"02aaa0f711b4ad53082db232fb4267dfd52a810e05bb5599044c64f80333d41c","abstract_canon_sha256":"ce89263465a2039574f3e7a58959eb92571a81164c09da45e42ecdb07bba8480"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:22.400526Z","signature_b64":"Cd6Buoma9SvodQTbrixLoEahAx5j7lYsrQmbuPcZZQPu7hF895/5KoZZmdD++IdVbEaR/AuGMCTW4cyR7vWzBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"58523fa9bdb65d403f275831266f5222fda5c9cc6ac823ff5461adb5c12ba1bd","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:22.400101Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:22.400101Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Solved problems and remaining challenges for Granger causality analysis in neuroscience: A response to Stokes and Purdon (2017)","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Adam B. Barrett, Anil K. Seth, Lionel Barnett","submitted_at":"2017-08-26T17:49:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"Granger-Geweke causality (GGC) is a powerful and popular method for identifying directed functional (`causal') connectivity in neuroscience. In a recent paper, Stokes and Purdon [1] raise several concerns about its use. They make two primary claims: (1) that GGC estimates may be severely biased or of high variance, and (2) that GGC fails to reveal the full structural/causal mechanisms of a system. However, these claims rest, respectively, on an incomplete evaluation of the literature, and a misconception about what GGC can be said to measure. Here we explain how existing approaches (as impleme"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1708.08001","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1708.08001","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:22.400158+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1708.08001v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:22.400158+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1708.08001","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:22.400158+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LBJD7KN5WZOU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:28.150371+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:28.150371+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LBJD7KN5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:28.150371+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LBJD7KN5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LBJD7KN5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1708.08001&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LBJD7KN5WZOUAPZHLAYSM32SEL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:22.400158+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:22.400158+00:00"}