{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7","short_pith_number":"pith:LBYGKZXB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"58706566e10aba224a5a0f004e69d9cfd654240c71d2491e3694f9e9155ec06e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1402.3733","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Contrary Inferences in Consistent Histories and a Set Selection Criterion","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Petros Wallden","submitted_at":"2014-02-15T23:46:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"The best developed formulation of closed system quantum theory that handles multiple-time statements, is the consistent (or decoherent) histories approach. The most important weaknesses of the approach is that it gives rise to many different consistent sets, and it has been argued that a complete interpretation should be accompanied with a natural mechanism leading to a (possibly) unique preferred consistent set. The existence of multiple consistent sets becomes more problematic because it allows the existence of contrary inferences (Kent 1997). We analyse the conceptual difficulties that aris"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1402.3733","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2014-02-15T23:46:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"37d69f86e748d36ffb47fe03cc117cb3e83953ea623f8e7de75d2e1ecdcace44","abstract_canon_sha256":"fd19cd8c32690e5dd003fad18ebbe87b61d59ec8d8241228cae514d4255208a8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:40:18.445549Z","signature_b64":"2dqB8Kw3abzc2wyYebghA3VF3cYGRneAWhQ7/9uZmfXN5cvNtWsNUWupApb+reh0sEPjWQAGwspCCEFlrK/FBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"58706566e10aba224a5a0f004e69d9cfd654240c71d2491e3694f9e9155ec06e","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:40:18.444936Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:40:18.444936Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Contrary Inferences in Consistent Histories and a Set Selection Criterion","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Petros Wallden","submitted_at":"2014-02-15T23:46:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"The best developed formulation of closed system quantum theory that handles multiple-time statements, is the consistent (or decoherent) histories approach. The most important weaknesses of the approach is that it gives rise to many different consistent sets, and it has been argued that a complete interpretation should be accompanied with a natural mechanism leading to a (possibly) unique preferred consistent set. The existence of multiple consistent sets becomes more problematic because it allows the existence of contrary inferences (Kent 1997). We analyse the conceptual difficulties that aris"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1402.3733","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1402.3733","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:40:18.445033+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1402.3733v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:40:18.445033+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1402.3733","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:40:18.445033+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LBYGKZXBBK5C","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:35.611951+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:35.611951+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LBYGKZXB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:35.611951+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LBYGKZXB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LBYGKZXB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1402.3733&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LBYGKZXBBK5CESS2B4AE42OZZ7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:40:18.445033+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:40:18.445033+00:00"}