{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO","short_pith_number":"pith:LCZRWHLV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"58b31b1d758387f3798030e0a147ef1b8ed31dea4ab980832468b55b95f50230","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.01307","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Language models self-improve under RL when they already use reasoning behaviors like verification and backtracking, even if answers start wrong.","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anikait Singh, Ayush Chakravarthy, Kanishk Gandhi, Nathan Lile, Noah D. Goodman","submitted_at":"2025-03-03T08:46:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Test-time inference has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enabling language models to ``think'' longer and more carefully about complex challenges, much like skilled human experts. While reinforcement learning (RL) can drive self-improvement in language models on verifiable tasks, some models exhibit substantial gains while others quickly plateau. For instance, we find that Qwen-2.5-3B far exceeds Llama-3.2-3B under identical RL training for the game of Countdown. This discrepancy raises a critical question: what intrinsic properties enable effective self-improvement? We introduce a framework"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.01307","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-03-03T08:46:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"5c72c80b98692a5792570317ad7d7dd3867bafe3f7650e1d3249552d881d6454","abstract_canon_sha256":"e80df4aaa9bea370f731c3395f6612069d2591cace4f314da6bfa0033140542e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:14.216996Z","signature_b64":"ig+cVdH+98EHiy2FGhAiwRtc5ll2ngS/VYNi5Bkt6kFCiSf6bfWgQKP+mfntgktShEZ4zYJN+eF8Cr/VNhx+Ag==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"58b31b1d758387f3798030e0a147ef1b8ed31dea4ab980832468b55b95f50230","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:14.216463Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:14.216463Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Language models self-improve under RL when they already use reasoning behaviors like verification and backtracking, even if answers start wrong.","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anikait Singh, Ayush Chakravarthy, Kanishk Gandhi, Nathan Lile, Noah D. Goodman","submitted_at":"2025-03-03T08:46:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Test-time inference has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enabling language models to ``think'' longer and more carefully about complex challenges, much like skilled human experts. While reinforcement learning (RL) can drive self-improvement in language models on verifiable tasks, some models exhibit substantial gains while others quickly plateau. For instance, we find that Qwen-2.5-3B far exceeds Llama-3.2-3B under identical RL training for the game of Countdown. This discrepancy raises a critical question: what intrinsic properties enable effective self-improvement? We introduce a framework"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"the presence of reasoning behaviors, rather than correctness of answers, proves to be the critical factor -- models primed with incorrect solutions containing proper reasoning patterns achieve comparable performance to those trained on correct solutions.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the four identified cognitive behaviors are the primary causal drivers of self-improvement differences, and that the controlled priming experiments isolate their effect without confounding influences from model architecture, training history, or unmeasured variables.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Language models that naturally exhibit verification, backtracking, subgoal setting, and backward chaining improve substantially during RL on verifiable tasks, and these behaviors can be instilled via priming with reasoning-focused examples or filtered pretraining to enable self-improvement.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Language models self-improve under RL when they already use reasoning behaviors like verification and backtracking, even if answers start wrong.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"b3b7f7ed2aee6989940632b64d448131598ff90e729b43e131a4114ab3d29fe4"},"source":{"id":"2503.01307","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"d32bc172-cd96-443c-8f1d-e4c9ed08c525","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-17T11:35:31.116346Z","strongest_claim":"the presence of reasoning behaviors, rather than correctness of answers, proves to be the critical factor -- models primed with incorrect solutions containing proper reasoning patterns achieve comparable performance to those trained on correct solutions.","one_line_summary":"Language models that naturally exhibit verification, backtracking, subgoal setting, and backward chaining improve substantially during RL on verifiable tasks, and these behaviors can be instilled via priming with reasoning-focused examples or filtered pretraining to enable self-improvement.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the four identified cognitive behaviors are the primary causal drivers of self-improvement differences, and that the controlled priming experiments isolate their effect without confounding influences from model architecture, training history, or unmeasured variables.","pith_extraction_headline":"Language models self-improve under RL when they already use reasoning behaviors like verification and backtracking, even if answers start wrong."},"references":{"count":13,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"REINFORCE++: Stabilizing Critic-Free Policy Optimization with Global Advantage Normalization","work_id":"557f9e99-cb00-4dd2-92fd-67ddcddbb35d","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"2501.03262","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"10.1007/bf00992696","year":1971,"title":"Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters","work_id":"a8d50b24-bdf5-46ed-bc4f-2927dfd81f1d","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"2408.03314","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Backtracking Only: This dataset focuses exclusively on the backtracking strategy, where the model explores solution paths and retreats when encountering dead ends","work_id":"f16db8fe-855e-4c6c-a8fa-f1b9b2d94974","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Backtracking with Answer Verification: In addition to backtracking, this dataset incorporates answer verification, where the model checks its intermediate solutions with the target number","work_id":"21872aad-715f-42df-b5f6-c07cc9b3f044","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Backtracking with Subgoal Setting: This dataset combines backtracking with explicit subgoal setting, where the model breaks down complex problems into manageable intermediate steps","work_id":"6ed3f964-44b3-49d8-9995-34339ece07bc","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":13,"snapshot_sha256":"d2d6933031d2432c2eabe21412e254ed5ecfd3aff4e4e56a5ba08b58f7538823","internal_anchors":2},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"854cd3056e3b064c23e435fb4997486e49c6b91dacf8af2db1acc702d7ea385b"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.01307","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:14.216551+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.01307v2","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:14.216551+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.01307","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:14.216551+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LCZRWHLVQOD7","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LCZRWHLV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":31,"internal_anchor_count":31,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22567","citing_title":"LANG: Reinforcement Learning for Multilingual Reasoning with Language-Adaptive Hint Guidance","ref_index":73,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.23678","citing_title":"Grounded Reinforcement Learning for Visual Reasoning","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.01679","citing_title":"Blending Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning with Prefix Sampling","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.15778","citing_title":"Stabilizing Knowledge, Promoting Reasoning: Dual-Token Constraints for RLVR","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10930","citing_title":"Evaluating the False Trust Engendered by LLM Explanations","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17497","citing_title":"Self-Supervised On-Policy Distillation for Reasoning Language Models","ref_index":79,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16874","citing_title":"Reasoning Can Be Restored by Correcting a Few Decision Tokens","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.24864","citing_title":"ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Models","ref_index":56,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.17784","citing_title":"Proximal Supervised Fine-Tuning","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.05489","citing_title":"Self-Aligned Reward: Towards Effective and Efficient Reasoners","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.15134","citing_title":"The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.21882","citing_title":"Position: The Hidden Costs and Measurement Gaps of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.05837","citing_title":"EEPO: Exploration-Enhanced Policy Optimization via Sample-Then-Forget","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.08827","citing_title":"A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models","ref_index":153,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.13026","citing_title":"REVISOR: Beyond Textual Reflection, Towards Multimodal Introspective Reasoning in Long-Form Video Understanding","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.20233","citing_title":"REFLEX: Self-Refining Explainable Fact-Checking via Verdict-Anchored Style Control","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.20814","citing_title":"SPHINX: A Synthetic Environment for Visual Perception and Reasoning","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.01925","citing_title":"Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of Optimization","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.21619","citing_title":"On the Overscaling Curse of Parallel Thinking: System Efficacy Contradicts Sample Efficiency","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.11456","citing_title":"DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoning","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.20571","citing_title":"Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13165","citing_title":"STOP: Structured On-Policy Pruning of Long-Form Reasoning in Low-Data Regimes","ref_index":55,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11922","citing_title":"StepCodeReasoner: Aligning Code Reasoning with Stepwise Execution Traces via Reinforcement Learning","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.01939","citing_title":"Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.09567","citing_title":"Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models","ref_index":197,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LCZRWHLV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LCZRWHLV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.01307&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LCZRWHLVQOD7G6MAGDQKCR7PDO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:14.216551+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:14.216551+00:00"}