{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ","short_pith_number":"pith:LDXQXNVN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"58ef0bb6ad7b8da7543d9aa55dc13b0c1b6599796e6bff9f4731d8951e70ffd3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1808.09123","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Investigating Human + Machine Complementarity for Recidivism Predictions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ece Kamar, Julius Adebayo, Kori Inkpen, Sarah Tan","submitted_at":"2018-08-28T05:28:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"When might human input help (or not) when assessing risk in fairness domains? Dressel and Farid (2018) asked Mechanical Turk workers to evaluate a subset of defendants in the ProPublica COMPAS data for risk of recidivism, and concluded that COMPAS predictions were no more accurate or fair than predictions made by humans. We delve deeper into this claim to explore differences in human and algorithmic decision making. We construct a Human Risk Score based on the predictions made by multiple Turk workers, characterize the features that determine agreement and disagreement between COMPAS and Human"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1808.09123","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2018-08-28T05:28:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"07dca2829336bd06518ab8f1029ad26de3184eb11d9a04a794e36852042de388","abstract_canon_sha256":"47152a2a502eb1811a16894ce14dcc412cffdf8da52dcd1bde2e09d95ca2b8d1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:22.366118Z","signature_b64":"KEVvg6C3fBrFY4tJXBaK+7/3P+gTgnw+Ib+11g8Xuume1nXM2KCt/stCYL1bcJp8zXpPDznSQ2wA2bYwM1P7Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"58ef0bb6ad7b8da7543d9aa55dc13b0c1b6599796e6bff9f4731d8951e70ffd3","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:22.365665Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:22.365665Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Investigating Human + Machine Complementarity for Recidivism Predictions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ece Kamar, Julius Adebayo, Kori Inkpen, Sarah Tan","submitted_at":"2018-08-28T05:28:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"When might human input help (or not) when assessing risk in fairness domains? Dressel and Farid (2018) asked Mechanical Turk workers to evaluate a subset of defendants in the ProPublica COMPAS data for risk of recidivism, and concluded that COMPAS predictions were no more accurate or fair than predictions made by humans. We delve deeper into this claim to explore differences in human and algorithmic decision making. We construct a Human Risk Score based on the predictions made by multiple Turk workers, characterize the features that determine agreement and disagreement between COMPAS and Human"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1808.09123","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1808.09123","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:22.365752+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1808.09123v2","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:22.365752+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1808.09123","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:22.365752+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LDXQXNVNPOG2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LDXQXNVN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2402.06287","citing_title":"AI, Meet Human: Learning Paradigms for Hybrid Decision Making Systems","ref_index":145,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.09871","citing_title":"Epistemology gives a Future to Complementarity in Human-AI Interactions","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LDXQXNVN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LDXQXNVN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1808.09123&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LDXQXNVNPOG2OVB5TKSV3QJ3BQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:22.365752+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:22.365752+00:00"}