{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM","short_pith_number":"pith:LFD4RMKD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5947c8b143426b037eebcefd819dae631050f0ab102a4a2f7c4b892264502bd5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2104.06917","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is Disentanglement all you need? Comparing Concept-based & Disentanglement Approaches","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Adrian Weller, Botty Dimanov, Dmitry Kazhdan, Helena Andres Terre, Mateja Jamnik, Pietro Li\\`o","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T15:06:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Concept-based explanations have emerged as a popular way of extracting human-interpretable representations from deep discriminative models. At the same time, the disentanglement learning literature has focused on extracting similar representations in an unsupervised or weakly-supervised way, using deep generative models. Despite the overlapping goals and potential synergies, to our knowledge, there has not yet been a systematic comparison of the limitations and trade-offs between concept-based explanations and disentanglement approaches. In this paper, we give an overview of these fields, comp"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2104.06917","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T15:06:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"038c0537d6144d404b553bf6867cbfae8c3e05cd2f381a7a4cd5a6632b378db4","abstract_canon_sha256":"40391dbf4cc1e85c4e4870da374c1ae5ce23b74c81785151cff33e2ae8d6c981"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024915Z","signature_b64":"uhymyOEhhTLV8/ZTQ9yIFAl3zGY5BSNJwd/EBqU83V11908iU8+FX3U7+a+9UntYiZYXViFKpz5gMDuiJ3OeDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5947c8b143426b037eebcefd819dae631050f0ab102a4a2f7c4b892264502bd5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024411Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024411Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is Disentanglement all you need? Comparing Concept-based & Disentanglement Approaches","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Adrian Weller, Botty Dimanov, Dmitry Kazhdan, Helena Andres Terre, Mateja Jamnik, Pietro Li\\`o","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T15:06:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Concept-based explanations have emerged as a popular way of extracting human-interpretable representations from deep discriminative models. At the same time, the disentanglement learning literature has focused on extracting similar representations in an unsupervised or weakly-supervised way, using deep generative models. Despite the overlapping goals and potential synergies, to our knowledge, there has not yet been a systematic comparison of the limitations and trade-offs between concept-based explanations and disentanglement approaches. In this paper, we give an overview of these fields, comp"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2104.06917","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2104.06917/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2104.06917","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2104.06917v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2104.06917","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LFD4RMKDIJVQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XL","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LFD4RMKD","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024474+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.10669","citing_title":"In Defense of Information Leakage in Concept-based Models","ref_index":181,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.19774","citing_title":"If Concept Bottlenecks are the Question, are Foundation Models the Answer?","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16405","citing_title":"Concepts Worth Having: Refining VLM-Guided Concept Bottleneck Models with Minimal Annotations","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08201","citing_title":"Weakly Supervised Concept Learning for Object-centric Visual Reasoning","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LFD4RMKD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LFD4RMKD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2104.06917&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LFD4RMKDIJVQG7XLZ36YDHNOMM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024474+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:11.024474+00:00"}