{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT","short_pith_number":"pith:LGJKZNHI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5992acb4e8a5deb37a0f5e0937dd2964f315e66c279f1ba199d39b8faaf35d96","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.11854","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Attributions toward Artificial Agents in a modified Moral Turing Test","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Caelan Alexander, Daniel J. Brady, Eddy Nahmias, Eyal Aharoni, Javier Rando, Kara Queen, Michael Criner, Sharlene Fernandes, Victor Crespo","submitted_at":"2024-04-03T13:00:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) raise important questions about whether people view moral evaluations by AI systems similarly to human-generated moral evaluations. We conducted a modified Moral Turing Test (m-MTT), inspired by Allen and colleagues' (2000) proposal, by asking people to distinguish real human moral evaluations from those made by a popular advanced AI language model: GPT-4. A representative sample of 299 U.S. adults first rated the quality of moral evaluations when blinded to their source. Remarkably, they rated the AI's moral reasoning as superior in quality to humans' "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.11854","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-04-03T13:00:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"f648ee485a6a4a4a0551ecc2e908a8121de6fb8e04ff83df0b845f7ca0aa17a0","abstract_canon_sha256":"02f6413c5d31495eb9a37c93769f252f739cb84946c5ba4c3d70137c80397c64"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.480338Z","signature_b64":"ijqIqDFerVKN11K8vDMPs+wF5HjwrTmzqoAlfW8OiAYveS7j20WvWmCkXBYRLUuZw1VGpdCyfUBddtA+GacNDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5992acb4e8a5deb37a0f5e0937dd2964f315e66c279f1ba199d39b8faaf35d96","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.477341Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.477341Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Attributions toward Artificial Agents in a modified Moral Turing Test","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Caelan Alexander, Daniel J. Brady, Eddy Nahmias, Eyal Aharoni, Javier Rando, Kara Queen, Michael Criner, Sharlene Fernandes, Victor Crespo","submitted_at":"2024-04-03T13:00:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) raise important questions about whether people view moral evaluations by AI systems similarly to human-generated moral evaluations. We conducted a modified Moral Turing Test (m-MTT), inspired by Allen and colleagues' (2000) proposal, by asking people to distinguish real human moral evaluations from those made by a popular advanced AI language model: GPT-4. A representative sample of 299 U.S. adults first rated the quality of moral evaluations when blinded to their source. Remarkably, they rated the AI's moral reasoning as superior in quality to humans' "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.11854","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.11854/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.11854","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.477451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.11854v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.477451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.11854","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.477451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LGJKZNHIUXPL","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.477451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QP","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.477451+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LGJKZNHI","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.477451+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.05583","citing_title":"The Judgment-Consequence Gap: LLM Moral Reasoning in Healthcare Decisions","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LGJKZNHI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LGJKZNHI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.11854&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LGJKZNHIUXPLG6QPLYETPXJJMT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.477451+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:33:02.477451+00:00"}