{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2012:LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL","short_pith_number":"pith:LIMVGEP4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5a195311fc2d2f11c8f2aedb2616a87af32db1e57776e009b6a7ef749a318072","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1211.0809","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"POPCORN: A comparison of binary population synthesis codes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","authors_text":"J. S. W. Claeys, N. Mennekens, S. Toonen","submitted_at":"2012-11-05T10:00:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"We compare the results of three binary population synthesis codes to understand the differences in their results. As a first result we find that when equalizing the assumptions the results are similar. The main differences arise from deviating physical input."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1211.0809","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","submitted_at":"2012-11-05T10:00:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d95edd5823124802a63c06872599b9e819a15d5ae3de7aa19b4196b421293283","abstract_canon_sha256":"79385a58777b0faecafbf42a11928d4ff188c60284fad39b1b7e16285f289d47"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:41:31.467795Z","signature_b64":"K1QD1WsrdV6d+l76uMQtkVCE2XaSeBqbmUCjuRe65o6TYUrae91ntsjgofSnBmJQNuDciwaAxM8Ihl2Tvq4mBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5a195311fc2d2f11c8f2aedb2616a87af32db1e57776e009b6a7ef749a318072","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:41:31.467133Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:41:31.467133Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"POPCORN: A comparison of binary population synthesis codes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","authors_text":"J. S. W. Claeys, N. Mennekens, S. Toonen","submitted_at":"2012-11-05T10:00:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"We compare the results of three binary population synthesis codes to understand the differences in their results. As a first result we find that when equalizing the assumptions the results are similar. The main differences arise from deviating physical input."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1211.0809","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1211.0809","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:41:31.467240+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1211.0809v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:41:31.467240+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1211.0809","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:41:31.467240+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LIMVGEP4FUXR","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:14.488303+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHS","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:14.488303+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LIMVGEP4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:14.488303+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LIMVGEP4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LIMVGEP4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1211.0809&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LIMVGEP4FUXRDSHSV3NSMFVIPL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:41:31.467240+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:41:31.467240+00:00"}