{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG","short_pith_number":"pith:LMDB2JYS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5b061d2712c59ec7f16e21af6dd887c9b8da6845085bcd908f1a517220b09769","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.12603","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Another Angle on Benchmarking Noncovalent Interactions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.chem-ph","authors_text":"A. Daniel Boese, Jan M. L. Martin, Micha{\\l} Lesiuk, Vladimir Fishman","submitted_at":"2024-10-16T14:23:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"For noncovalent interactions (NCIs), the CCSD(T) coupled cluster method is widely regarded as the `gold standard'. With localized orbital approximations, benchmarks for ever larger NCI complexes are being published; yet tantalizing evidence from quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) results appears to indicate that as the system size grows, CCSD(T) overbinds NCIs by progressively larger amounts, particularly when $\\pi$-stacking is involved. Alas, post-CCSD(T) methods like CCSDT(Q) are cost-prohibitive, which requires us to consider alternative means of estimating post-CCSD(T) contributions. In this work, "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.12603","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.chem-ph","submitted_at":"2024-10-16T14:23:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e81f049fef410e7c17ba3151097cb74d9ecfa8a09242bb615f614bb9d2a2a626","abstract_canon_sha256":"39f8b14287533a76d8fc7c99c6a85cf3449d1672432674f1127f93d03213deff"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126818Z","signature_b64":"0o3PtrvLLwtEImv+4+sdiOXG1Go1fYoGWG/TnjN0mQiLcKxR45Yf+5EupyX27afXVYGK+qwX6rbc2KVpaab0AA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5b061d2712c59ec7f16e21af6dd887c9b8da6845085bcd908f1a517220b09769","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126171Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126171Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Another Angle on Benchmarking Noncovalent Interactions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.chem-ph","authors_text":"A. Daniel Boese, Jan M. L. Martin, Micha{\\l} Lesiuk, Vladimir Fishman","submitted_at":"2024-10-16T14:23:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"For noncovalent interactions (NCIs), the CCSD(T) coupled cluster method is widely regarded as the `gold standard'. With localized orbital approximations, benchmarks for ever larger NCI complexes are being published; yet tantalizing evidence from quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) results appears to indicate that as the system size grows, CCSD(T) overbinds NCIs by progressively larger amounts, particularly when $\\pi$-stacking is involved. Alas, post-CCSD(T) methods like CCSDT(Q) are cost-prohibitive, which requires us to consider alternative means of estimating post-CCSD(T) contributions. In this work, "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.12603","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.12603/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.12603","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126252+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.12603v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126252+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.12603","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126252+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LMDB2JYSYWPM","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126252+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LO","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126252+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LMDB2JYS","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126252+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.16405","citing_title":"Systematic discrepancies between reference methods for non-covalent interactions within the S66 dataset","ref_index":53,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LMDB2JYS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LMDB2JYS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.12603&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LMDB2JYSYWPMP4LOEGXW3WEHZG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126252+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:25.126252+00:00"}