{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A","short_pith_number":"pith:LMV7D463","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5b2bf1f3db5149cfef39e7f681e3bfd81f17e3e7e67f00a475a28fa5e97de737","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2604.21212","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Legal Infrastructure Organizes Eviction: Evidence from Philadelphia","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Eviction in Philadelphia is organized upstream by a concentrated plaintiff-side legal infrastructure of dominant attorneys and repeat property filings.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Marios Papamichalis, Regina Ruane","submitted_at":"2026-04-23T02:06:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"We analyze the filing-side legal infrastructure of eviction using 755,004 Philadelphia Municipal Court landlord-tenant records filed between 1969 and 2022, of which 747,125 are residential. Eviction in Philadelphia is organized upstream by a concentrated plaintiff-side bar, durable plaintiff-attorney dependence, repeated use of the same properties, and recurring tenant-name exposure. Between 1983 and 2022, the ten most active plaintiff attorneys handled 82.2% of represented plaintiff-side cases per year on average, compared with 14.8% for the ten most active plaintiffs. Large plaintiffs depend"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.21212","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2026-04-23T02:06:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"1670306d2112bbdafa42a5dc8ceb6a62679400fc4ec9f7a9d1209515e3d54d6e","abstract_canon_sha256":"75e5397b4738f61f78249e168ae6aff0f2d97fb52093d122e691f1ba06559ec8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080940Z","signature_b64":"FHMw6lTxxbm3vrqw12rJ0EZCY+B5ivjrU0um57rNlkOi1p+dpF3J751J/1MvvO1TxKDoWidAJlpgk0zHUHzKCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5b2bf1f3db5149cfef39e7f681e3bfd81f17e3e7e67f00a475a28fa5e97de737","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080017Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080017Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Legal Infrastructure Organizes Eviction: Evidence from Philadelphia","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Eviction in Philadelphia is organized upstream by a concentrated plaintiff-side legal infrastructure of dominant attorneys and repeat property filings.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Marios Papamichalis, Regina Ruane","submitted_at":"2026-04-23T02:06:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"We analyze the filing-side legal infrastructure of eviction using 755,004 Philadelphia Municipal Court landlord-tenant records filed between 1969 and 2022, of which 747,125 are residential. Eviction in Philadelphia is organized upstream by a concentrated plaintiff-side bar, durable plaintiff-attorney dependence, repeated use of the same properties, and recurring tenant-name exposure. Between 1983 and 2022, the ten most active plaintiff attorneys handled 82.2% of represented plaintiff-side cases per year on average, compared with 14.8% for the ten most active plaintiffs. Large plaintiffs depend"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"eviction is organized upstream by a concentrated plaintiff-side bar, durable plaintiff--attorney dependence, repeated use of the same properties, and repeat exposure of tenants to the court system. In 1983--2022, the ten most active plaintiff attorneys handled an average of 82.0% of represented plaintiff-side cases, compared with 14.7% for the ten most active plaintiffs.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the observed docket patterns reflect organized legal infrastructure rather than artifacts of recording practices, unmeasured selection into the court system, or simple correlation without upstream causation.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Philadelphia eviction filings are dominated by a concentrated plaintiff bar (top 10 attorneys handle 82% of represented cases) and repeat addresses (50.6% have a prior filing within one year).","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Eviction in Philadelphia is organized upstream by a concentrated plaintiff-side legal infrastructure of dominant attorneys and repeat property filings.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"a234a8225c66b1a79f289f1cf9d8ae0be974e28fef6a723d46938c10e55d2721"},"source":{"id":"2604.21212","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":"0046dc88-4da2-4311-805a-d63e18b41e78","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-12T01:46:24.735946Z","strongest_claim":"eviction is organized upstream by a concentrated plaintiff-side bar, durable plaintiff--attorney dependence, repeated use of the same properties, and repeat exposure of tenants to the court system. In 1983--2022, the ten most active plaintiff attorneys handled an average of 82.0% of represented plaintiff-side cases, compared with 14.7% for the ten most active plaintiffs.","one_line_summary":"Philadelphia eviction filings are dominated by a concentrated plaintiff bar (top 10 attorneys handle 82% of represented cases) and repeat addresses (50.6% have a prior filing within one year).","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the observed docket patterns reflect organized legal infrastructure rather than artifacts of recording practices, unmeasured selection into the court system, or simple correlation without upstream causation.","pith_extraction_headline":"Eviction in Philadelphia is organized upstream by a concentrated plaintiff-side legal infrastructure of dominant attorneys and repeat property filings."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.21212/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-20T01:14:52.940085Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"d4bd21ceacaab7d9723a4bf00ea68b8f49327b5266b77b619f00c1c3cd216c56"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.21212","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.21212v3","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.21212","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LMV7D463KFE4","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LMV7D463KFE473ZZ","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LMV7D463","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080226+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21536","citing_title":"High-Volume Plaintiff-Side Counsel and Single-Appearance Eviction Cases in Philadelphia","ref_index":137,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LMV7D463"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LMV7D463","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2604.21212&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LMV7D463KFE473ZZ473IDY573A/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080226+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T01:04:26.080226+00:00"}