{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2011:LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK","short_pith_number":"pith:LN4L47ML","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5b78be7d8be57348587a1dea8826d34aa8c2e9b768fabbea74b1dbea2dedb644","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1108.6207","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Cosmic censorship in overcharging a Reissner-Nordstr\\\"{o}m black hole via charged particle absorption","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Norichika Sago, Soichiro Isoyama, Takahiro Tanaka","submitted_at":"2011-08-31T12:32:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"There is a claim that a static charged black hole (Reissner-Nordstr\\\"{o}m black hole) can be overcharged by absorbing a charged test particle. If it is true, it might give a counter example to the weak cosmic censorship conjecture, which states that spacetime singularities are never observed by a distant observer. However, so far the proposed process has only been analyzed within a test particle approximation. Here we claim that the back reaction effects of a charged particle cannot be neglected when judging whether the suggested process is really a counter example to the cosmic censorship con"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1108.6207","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2011-08-31T12:32:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"d1fd5a4a3f5f44a9cf2874801a74f8a86ae458b51df4b6c3b6d5982c0679f887","abstract_canon_sha256":"203d748e4640cfa671087ccce55b794b448bbcdffd07777c63ea2dad4816e163"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T04:06:07.656347Z","signature_b64":"tiHAD1lhCakwoBl4/lg96lRJ5DJmaEOJn+UEDZa3JvAZ6+aktOOunPHCbA+FmrDbkk/NXP1vBuFgplyMNUsBDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5b78be7d8be57348587a1dea8826d34aa8c2e9b768fabbea74b1dbea2dedb644","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T04:06:07.655829Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T04:06:07.655829Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Cosmic censorship in overcharging a Reissner-Nordstr\\\"{o}m black hole via charged particle absorption","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Norichika Sago, Soichiro Isoyama, Takahiro Tanaka","submitted_at":"2011-08-31T12:32:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"There is a claim that a static charged black hole (Reissner-Nordstr\\\"{o}m black hole) can be overcharged by absorbing a charged test particle. If it is true, it might give a counter example to the weak cosmic censorship conjecture, which states that spacetime singularities are never observed by a distant observer. However, so far the proposed process has only been analyzed within a test particle approximation. Here we claim that the back reaction effects of a charged particle cannot be neglected when judging whether the suggested process is really a counter example to the cosmic censorship con"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1108.6207","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1108.6207","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:06:07.655912+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1108.6207v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:06:07.655912+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1108.6207","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:06:07.655912+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LN4L47ML4VZU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:34.985390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:34.985390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LN4L47ML","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:34.985390+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.05384","citing_title":"Violating Weak Cosmic Censorship in AdS$_3$ via Gedanken Experiment","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LN4L47ML"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LN4L47ML","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1108.6207&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LN4L47ML4VZUQWD2DXVIQJWTJK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T04:06:07.655912+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T04:06:07.655912+00:00"}