{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY","short_pith_number":"pith:LOY5XWRQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5bb1dbda302286c442a47c69a1878b3e3d4032dc08c507f884f09773b6713e13","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.00059","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Generative AI Paradox: \"What It Can Create, It May Not Understand\"","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.CV","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Abhilasha Ravichander, Allyson Ettinger, Benjamin Newman, Faeze Brahman, Jena D. Hwang, Jillian Fisher, Khyathi Chandu, Linjie Li, Liwei Jiang, Nouha Dziri, Pang Wei Koh, Peter West, Ximing Lu, Yejin Choi","submitted_at":"2023-10-31T18:07:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"The recent wave of generative AI has sparked unprecedented global attention, with both excitement and concern over potentially superhuman levels of artificial intelligence: models now take only seconds to produce outputs that would challenge or exceed the capabilities even of expert humans. At the same time, models still show basic errors in understanding that would not be expected even in non-expert humans. This presents us with an apparent paradox: how do we reconcile seemingly superhuman capabilities with the persistence of errors that few humans would make? In this work, we posit that this"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.00059","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2023-10-31T18:07:07Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.CV","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"2a2f5099f58f4c84c11c35646fcb1a53920725158b361861f548a3e86ec6a383","abstract_canon_sha256":"fa78432d8a48163fda34767514570f09651f8233c4af6dde56cde3e75511b248"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618735Z","signature_b64":"sePpP87o9XuHaekPZ3w52L9oXyOBr8JYqCiNdbJbsVAOPQvt2uLb2BpOq+1FyInP+e4tdtPJ4CCwFa9UJk57Bg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5bb1dbda302286c442a47c69a1878b3e3d4032dc08c507f884f09773b6713e13","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618226Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618226Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Generative AI Paradox: \"What It Can Create, It May Not Understand\"","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.CV","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Abhilasha Ravichander, Allyson Ettinger, Benjamin Newman, Faeze Brahman, Jena D. Hwang, Jillian Fisher, Khyathi Chandu, Linjie Li, Liwei Jiang, Nouha Dziri, Pang Wei Koh, Peter West, Ximing Lu, Yejin Choi","submitted_at":"2023-10-31T18:07:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"The recent wave of generative AI has sparked unprecedented global attention, with both excitement and concern over potentially superhuman levels of artificial intelligence: models now take only seconds to produce outputs that would challenge or exceed the capabilities even of expert humans. At the same time, models still show basic errors in understanding that would not be expected even in non-expert humans. This presents us with an apparent paradox: how do we reconcile seemingly superhuman capabilities with the persistence of errors that few humans would make? In this work, we posit that this"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.00059","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.00059/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.00059","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.00059v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.00059","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LOY5XWRQEKDM","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVE","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618292+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LOY5XWRQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618292+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21008","citing_title":"The Metanym Game: A Self-Contained, Self-Consistent LLM Peer-Community Benchmark for Structural Intelligence","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.25426","citing_title":"Implicature in Interaction: Understanding Implicature Improves Alignment in Human-LLM Interaction","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LOY5XWRQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LOY5XWRQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.00059&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LOY5XWRQEKDMIQVEPRU2DB4LHY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618292+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:07:41.618292+00:00"}