{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO","short_pith_number":"pith:LR7DLUTN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5c7e35d26dee86db350545443ec035139249ac84472366e53491c693a36955ab","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1805.00302","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The decay $h\\to \\gamma\\gamma$ in the Standard-Model Effective Field Theory","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. Dedes, J. Rosiek, K. Suxho, L. Trifyllis, M. Paraskevas","submitted_at":"2018-05-01T13:01:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Assuming that new physics effects are parametrized by the Standard-Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) written in a complete basis of up to dimension-6 operators, we calculate the CP-conserving one-loop amplitude for the decay $h\\to \\gamma\\gamma$ in general $R_\\xi$-gauges. We employ a simple renormalisation scheme that is hybrid between on-shell SM-like renormalised parameters and running $\\overline{\\mathrm{MS}}$ Wilson coefficients. The resulting amplitude is then finite, renormalisation scale invariant, independent of the gauge choice ($\\xi$) and respects SM Ward identities. Remarkably, the"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1805.00302","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2018-05-01T13:01:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b5d168d4d39918eeb7c786a366b3ea5fca122b97190f113d4e286ad012e0af23","abstract_canon_sha256":"ded22f8a10cc3d8fe59abfaacbc963eb5d9211702569a47c26e27336a56534ed"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:58.661979Z","signature_b64":"m+stpGgyeaVmNBXznHtRK2nLPrVSh8x9nxhEdL15/o6xwYZow8Jf0Ku5fuAOELGP5Nt1JB0FhKK2rTzp+AgtCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5c7e35d26dee86db350545443ec035139249ac84472366e53491c693a36955ab","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:58.661480Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:58.661480Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The decay $h\\to \\gamma\\gamma$ in the Standard-Model Effective Field Theory","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. Dedes, J. Rosiek, K. Suxho, L. Trifyllis, M. Paraskevas","submitted_at":"2018-05-01T13:01:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Assuming that new physics effects are parametrized by the Standard-Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) written in a complete basis of up to dimension-6 operators, we calculate the CP-conserving one-loop amplitude for the decay $h\\to \\gamma\\gamma$ in general $R_\\xi$-gauges. We employ a simple renormalisation scheme that is hybrid between on-shell SM-like renormalised parameters and running $\\overline{\\mathrm{MS}}$ Wilson coefficients. The resulting amplitude is then finite, renormalisation scale invariant, independent of the gauge choice ($\\xi$) and respects SM Ward identities. Remarkably, the"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1805.00302","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1805.00302","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:58.661551+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1805.00302v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:58.661551+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1805.00302","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:58.661551+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LR7DLUTN52DN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LR7DLUTN52DNWNIF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LR7DLUTN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22608","citing_title":"Recent Developments in SMEFT: Theory, Tools, and Phenomenology","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LR7DLUTN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LR7DLUTN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1805.00302&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LR7DLUTN52DNWNIFIVCD5QBVCO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:58.661551+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:04:58.661551+00:00"}