Pith Number
pith:LSLQZTEX
pith:2018:LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable?
arxiv:1811.01803 v1 · 2018-11-05 · cs.DL
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-05-18T00:01:33.213648Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
5c970ccc97567da0eb8e78d5e90873713ebc39efc608d730f3e70b1711162633
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 5c970ccc97567da0eb8e78d5e90873713ebc39efc608d730f3e70b1711162633
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "fe0850a49b7b3aa650e08ed30e033b7a0abd7aaa4d4dee54577222c73ffb5b8f",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.DL",
"submitted_at": "2018-11-05T15:40:12Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "5d84577d99d7987fcefbc81d026e33c1d00a9a86d3e7c3bd597bd63f195f053c"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "1811.01803",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}