{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE","short_pith_number":"pith:LSLQZTEX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5c970ccc97567da0eb8e78d5e90873713ebc39efc608d730f3e70b1711162633","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1811.01803","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa, Giovanni Abramo","submitted_at":"2018-11-05T15:40:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"In recent years bibliometricians have paid increasing attention to research evaluation methodological problems, among these being the choice of the most appropriate indicators for evaluating quality of scientific publications, and thus for evaluating the work of single scientists, research groups and entire organizations. Much literature has been devoted to analyzing the robustness of various indicators, and many works warn against the risks of using easily available and relatively simple proxies, such as journal impact factor. The present work continues this line of research, examining whethe"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1811.01803","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2018-11-05T15:40:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"5d84577d99d7987fcefbc81d026e33c1d00a9a86d3e7c3bd597bd63f195f053c","abstract_canon_sha256":"fe0850a49b7b3aa650e08ed30e033b7a0abd7aaa4d4dee54577222c73ffb5b8f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:33.214178Z","signature_b64":"SAZasgwv+pPjg0NHmJtbWgjHr/x8g4PJVvCi5YYKSfhQ9madzzX/9xYePzeC7i1Ex6+1eYvW5tmbxNaJiAMPAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5c970ccc97567da0eb8e78d5e90873713ebc39efc608d730f3e70b1711162633","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:33.213648Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:33.213648Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa, Giovanni Abramo","submitted_at":"2018-11-05T15:40:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"In recent years bibliometricians have paid increasing attention to research evaluation methodological problems, among these being the choice of the most appropriate indicators for evaluating quality of scientific publications, and thus for evaluating the work of single scientists, research groups and entire organizations. Much literature has been devoted to analyzing the robustness of various indicators, and many works warn against the risks of using easily available and relatively simple proxies, such as journal impact factor. The present work continues this line of research, examining whethe"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1811.01803","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1811.01803","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:33.213724+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1811.01803v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:33.213724+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1811.01803","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:33.213724+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LSLQZTEXKZ62","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LSLQZTEXKZ62B24O","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LSLQZTEX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LSLQZTEX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LSLQZTEX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1811.01803&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LSLQZTEXKZ62B24OPDK6SCDTOE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:33.213724+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:01:33.213724+00:00"}