{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L","short_pith_number":"pith:LUE7ZIRF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5d09fca225ee27bfb4591a6cda99f2dae0ce62f60e472d7761ba863b9d1dacc8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2001.00919","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Competitive equilibria between staking and on-chain lending","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DC"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.GN","authors_text":"Tarun Chitra","submitted_at":"2019-11-28T01:22:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Proof of Stake (PoS) is a burgeoning Sybil resistance mechanism that aims to have a digital asset (\"token\") serve as security collateral in crypto networks. However, PoS has so far eluded a comprehensive threat model that encompasses both Byzantine attacks from distributed systems and financial attacks that arise from the dual usage of the token as a means of payment and a Sybil resistance mechanism. In particular, the existence of derivatives markets makes malicious coordination among validators easier to execute than in Proof of Work systems. We demonstrate that it is also possible for on-ch"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2001.00919","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.GN","submitted_at":"2019-11-28T01:22:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.DC"],"title_canon_sha256":"5d5d6c013a3688d152e780d5c1aeb0c30ae114a6b9826f5ff5a2f48f5b75e200","abstract_canon_sha256":"f01b6410f0118d22131c264003816cf320fe9d62679b2d6930ddf00f03e61f76"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.640163Z","signature_b64":"+w0vRV7qOMf/4NV6wbVM9/aMBnKQkxI5OcFVs9KPCYc7EdyfZgM7P1xocFVbk4kKMgyI5a2PqOHssqupJBtuDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5d09fca225ee27bfb4591a6cda99f2dae0ce62f60e472d7761ba863b9d1dacc8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.639737Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.639737Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Competitive equilibria between staking and on-chain lending","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DC"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.GN","authors_text":"Tarun Chitra","submitted_at":"2019-11-28T01:22:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Proof of Stake (PoS) is a burgeoning Sybil resistance mechanism that aims to have a digital asset (\"token\") serve as security collateral in crypto networks. However, PoS has so far eluded a comprehensive threat model that encompasses both Byzantine attacks from distributed systems and financial attacks that arise from the dual usage of the token as a means of payment and a Sybil resistance mechanism. In particular, the existence of derivatives markets makes malicious coordination among validators easier to execute than in Proof of Work systems. We demonstrate that it is also possible for on-ch"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2001.00919","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2001.00919/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2001.00919","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.639792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2001.00919v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.639792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2001.00919","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.639792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LUE7ZIRF5YT3","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.639792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.639792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LUE7ZIRF","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.639792+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07445","citing_title":"Bubbles vs. Baselines: Token Valuation and Institutional Capital in PoS Networks under EIP-1559","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LUE7ZIRF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LUE7ZIRF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2001.00919&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LUE7ZIRF5YT37NCZDJWNVGPS3L/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.639792+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:38:10.639792+00:00"}