{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4","short_pith_number":"pith:LWATNYVA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5d8136e2a05f1ab919f6d5ab72ea6587361120606e8085a8af2e66516f4fafa1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1908.05901","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Evaluating User Perception of Multi-Factor Authentication: A Systematic Review","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Bingxing Wang, L. Jean Camp, Sanchari Das, Zachary Tingle","submitted_at":"2019-08-16T09:14:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"Security vulnerabilities of traditional single factor authentication has become a major concern for security practitioners and researchers. To mitigate single point failures, new and technologically advanced Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) tools have been developed as security solutions. However, the usability and adoption of such tools have raised concerns. An obvious solution can be viewed as conducting user studies to create more user-friendly MFA tools. To learn more, we performed a systematic literature review of recently published academic papers (N = 623) that primarily focused on MFA"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1908.05901","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2019-08-16T09:14:32Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY","cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"304854615184912d0f6ee95089b7584d50c564ccbf51b534379c53705ba4d616","abstract_canon_sha256":"3e81e4d57b06e25d279e453ed0041c5806af73a00ae96008971026bad45fd115"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186428Z","signature_b64":"qpQ624oVKAVJ0YHtiTOhy2CBojmlCAfoTv7GH3FF7AqN9UlMduJItQdSnEMbN1cA7pwU8ko5jpQGFcgUaRN/AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5d8136e2a05f1ab919f6d5ab72ea6587361120606e8085a8af2e66516f4fafa1","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186019Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186019Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Evaluating User Perception of Multi-Factor Authentication: A Systematic Review","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Bingxing Wang, L. Jean Camp, Sanchari Das, Zachary Tingle","submitted_at":"2019-08-16T09:14:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"Security vulnerabilities of traditional single factor authentication has become a major concern for security practitioners and researchers. To mitigate single point failures, new and technologically advanced Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) tools have been developed as security solutions. However, the usability and adoption of such tools have raised concerns. An obvious solution can be viewed as conducting user studies to create more user-friendly MFA tools. To learn more, we performed a systematic literature review of recently published academic papers (N = 623) that primarily focused on MFA"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1908.05901","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1908.05901/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1908.05901","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186075+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1908.05901v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186075+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1908.05901","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186075+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LWATNYVAL4NL","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186075+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186075+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LWATNYVA","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186075+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06371","citing_title":"The Impact of Security and Privacy Controls on Users' Emotional Engagement with Generative AI Chatbots","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LWATNYVA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/LWATNYVA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1908.05901&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/LWATNYVAL4NLSGPW2WVXF2TFQ4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186075+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T23:57:54.186075+00:00"}