{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U","short_pith_number":"pith:LWGN5733","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.13307","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T10:21:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"73adfa24b97a1fde99fddce2b7912ea201be3a8a66572b64f027e86771c922cf","abstract_canon_sha256":"a7c650be4e82594d7f65d4f09eba4ef0a2bee9b4838484604b0e1cb3d49763c9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"5d8cdeff7bf13f69f48ff92310252ddd2c4ef2f92e5b4df332d6d0db8ed1ded2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.13307","version":1},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.13307","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.13307v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.13307","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LWGN57336E7W","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LWGN57336E7WT5EP","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LWGN5733","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.13307","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T10:21:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"73adfa24b97a1fde99fddce2b7912ea201be3a8a66572b64f027e86771c922cf","abstract_canon_sha256":"a7c650be4e82594d7f65d4f09eba4ef0a2bee9b4838484604b0e1cb3d49763c9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"5d8cdeff7bf13f69f48ff92310252ddd2c4ef2f92e5b4df332d6d0db8ed1ded2","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48.932334Z","signature_b64":"h5CR680Q2CkIszH2GLKEDX+Gd2cDiO0TsLnFVKrfvVxRZeYYmIsga7Fxup+r6rLP6vNQkUJhbgoGsk2PJWPTBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5d8cdeff7bf13f69f48ff92310252ddd2c4ef2f92e5b4df332d6d0db8ed1ded2","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48.931840Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48.931840Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2605.13307","source_version":1,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"CDCcucCfmLVmDtQB5ycqaMTjEm6LsJlTdJW72owpcIAfjnfYnReOar0uGBhWs5jKwbW/7FHDL/VencXpY7d5Bw==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-06-03T06:08:20.138416Z"},"content_sha256":"cf0c44eadc010ff684f2f6ffdf59649610b31b7a40c7b79fb7bd78ca63ee2be8","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:cf0c44eadc010ff684f2f6ffdf59649610b31b7a40c7b79fb7bd78ca63ee2be8"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"PRISM-X: Experiments on Personalised Fine-Tuning with Human and Simulated Users","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Preference fine-tuning on pooled data nearly matches individual personalization and beats prompting in real-user tests.","cross_cats":["cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bertie Vidgen, Christopher Summerfield, Fanzhi Zeng, Hannah Rose Kirk, Henry Davidson, Liu Leqi, Scott A. Hale","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T10:21:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"Personalisation is a standard feature of conversational AI systems used by millions; yet, the efficacy of personalisation methods is often evaluated in academic research using simulated users rather than real people. This raises questions about how users and their simulated counterparts differ in interaction patterns and judgements, as well as whether personalisation is best achieved through context-based prompting or weight-based fine-tuning. Here, in a large-scale within-subject experiment, we re-recruit 530 participants from 52 countries two years after they gave their preferences in the PR"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"preference fine-tuning (P-DPO) significantly outperforms both a generic model and personalised prompting but adapting to individual preference data yields marginal gains over training on pooled preferences from a diverse population. Beyond length biases, fine-tuning amplifies sycophancy and relationship-seeking behaviours that people reward in short-term evaluations but which may introduce deleterious long-term consequences.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That preferences collected two years earlier remain stable enough to serve as ground truth for current personalisation, and that blinded multi-turn conversations isolate the effects of fine-tuning versus prompting without confounding factors such as conversation length or topic selection.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Preference fine-tuning outperforms prompting for personalisation but amplifies sycophancy and relationship-seeking, while simulated users recover aggregate rankings yet show far lower self-consistency and different topic and position biases than real humans.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Preference fine-tuning on pooled data nearly matches individual personalization and beats prompting in real-user tests.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"3fc5ac13b1d46421229c212b5a7f38e7ebc9335ca1d0d524d03d02732d6005ad"},"source":{"id":"2605.13307","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"4ade3a59-f6ff-4823-8968-01951d46fd90","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-14T20:29:51.648514Z","strongest_claim":"preference fine-tuning (P-DPO) significantly outperforms both a generic model and personalised prompting but adapting to individual preference data yields marginal gains over training on pooled preferences from a diverse population. Beyond length biases, fine-tuning amplifies sycophancy and relationship-seeking behaviours that people reward in short-term evaluations but which may introduce deleterious long-term consequences.","one_line_summary":"Preference fine-tuning outperforms prompting for personalisation but amplifies sycophancy and relationship-seeking, while simulated users recover aggregate rankings yet show far lower self-consistency and different topic and position biases than real humans.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That preferences collected two years earlier remain stable enough to serve as ground truth for current personalisation, and that blinded multi-turn conversations isolate the effects of fine-tuning versus prompting without confounding factors such as conversation length or topic selection.","pith_extraction_headline":"Preference fine-tuning on pooled data nearly matches individual personalization and beats prompting in real-user tests."},"references":{"count":42,"sample":[{"doi":"10.64628/aa.cecjagfn5","year":2025,"title":"URL https://support.claude.com/en/articles/10185728-understanding-cl aude-s-personalization-features. N. O. Attah. AI models might be drawn to ‘spiritual bliss’. Then again, they might just talk like ","work_id":"87540032-eb75-462d-9c1f-006271265fd8","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.358","year":2025,"title":"arXiv:2309.16349 [cs]","work_id":"6a41a1f8-683a-4fc5-88de-6283ab9025da","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Mitigating Length Bias in RLHF through a Causal Lens","work_id":"34395c42-4094-4a0e-aa80-93c8ee6ab53f","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243","year":2024,"title":"doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243","work_id":"f7865b08-1db6-4a3c-ae44-d1fc2aac179e","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.847","year":1974,"title":"UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction","work_id":"54c15172-6304-4008-a3b6-c4cc0803c054","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"1802.03426","is_internal_anchor":true}],"resolved_work":42,"snapshot_sha256":"6f3bae9e10062f9eb6fb2a5223c13a678c3b4d93f0ff8e7322a38e815be34f4c","internal_anchors":2},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"4a6b43de8e9deed569cbe406fca641140b6533488c12f9711b8e29c7ea4cc582"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"4ade3a59-f6ff-4823-8968-01951d46fd90"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"fH73kum6WpMoOCc6PbLNM+WzJc51K2nZmQSGYBp5o3c4p9xl3q8sv2zMF/ksgobpL1Riqa1HZXZO0J9PIaolCA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-06-03T06:08:20.139086Z"},"content_sha256":"e2cf787f28df3dbaa4c0ec440acc76a2b3fee223ece00395833fcc376ee2d4b8","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:e2cf787f28df3dbaa4c0ec440acc76a2b3fee223ece00395833fcc376ee2d4b8"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-06-03T06:08:20Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:LWGN57336E7WT5EP7ERRAJJN3U","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"a7c650be4e82594d7f65d4f09eba4ef0a2bee9b4838484604b0e1cb3d49763c9","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.HC"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T10:21:14Z","title_canon_sha256":"73adfa24b97a1fde99fddce2b7912ea201be3a8a66572b64f027e86771c922cf"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.13307","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.13307","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.13307v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.13307","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"LWGN57336E7W","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"LWGN57336E7WT5EP","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"LWGN5733","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:e2cf787f28df3dbaa4c0ec440acc76a2b3fee223ece00395833fcc376ee2d4b8","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"preference fine-tuning (P-DPO) significantly outperforms both a generic model and personalised prompting but adapting to individual preference data yields marginal gains over training on pooled preferences from a diverse population. Beyond length biases, fine-tuning amplifies sycophancy and relationship-seeking behaviours that people reward in short-term evaluations but which may introduce deleterious long-term consequences."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That preferences collected two years earlier remain stable enough to serve as ground truth for current personalisation, and that blinded multi-turn conversations isolate the effects of fine-tuning versus prompting without confounding factors such as conversation length or topic selection."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Preference fine-tuning outperforms prompting for personalisation but amplifies sycophancy and relationship-seeking, while simulated users recover aggregate rankings yet show far lower self-consistency and different topic and position biases than real humans."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Preference fine-tuning on pooled data nearly matches individual personalization and beats prompting in real-user tests."}],"snapshot_sha256":"3fc5ac13b1d46421229c212b5a7f38e7ebc9335ca1d0d524d03d02732d6005ad"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"4a6b43de8e9deed569cbe406fca641140b6533488c12f9711b8e29c7ea4cc582"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Personalisation is a standard feature of conversational AI systems used by millions; yet, the efficacy of personalisation methods is often evaluated in academic research using simulated users rather than real people. This raises questions about how users and their simulated counterparts differ in interaction patterns and judgements, as well as whether personalisation is best achieved through context-based prompting or weight-based fine-tuning. Here, in a large-scale within-subject experiment, we re-recruit 530 participants from 52 countries two years after they gave their preferences in the PR","authors_text":"Bertie Vidgen, Christopher Summerfield, Fanzhi Zeng, Hannah Rose Kirk, Henry Davidson, Liu Leqi, Scott A. Hale","cross_cats":["cs.HC"],"headline":"Preference fine-tuning on pooled data nearly matches individual personalization and beats prompting in real-user tests.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T10:21:14Z","title":"PRISM-X: Experiments on Personalised Fine-Tuning with Human and Simulated Users"},"references":{"count":42,"internal_anchors":2,"resolved_work":42,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.64628/aa.cecjagfn5","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"URL https://support.claude.com/en/articles/10185728-understanding-cl aude-s-personalization-features. N. O. Attah. AI models might be drawn to ‘spiritual bliss’. Then again, they might just talk like ","work_id":"87540032-eb75-462d-9c1f-006271265fd8","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.358","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"arXiv:2309.16349 [cs]","work_id":"6a41a1f8-683a-4fc5-88de-6283ab9025da","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Mitigating Length Bias in RLHF through a Causal Lens","work_id":"34395c42-4094-4a0e-aa80-93c8ee6ab53f","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243","work_id":"f7865b08-1db6-4a3c-ae44-d1fc2aac179e","year":2024},{"cited_arxiv_id":"1802.03426","doi":"10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.847","is_internal_anchor":true,"ref_index":5,"title":"UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction","work_id":"54c15172-6304-4008-a3b6-c4cc0803c054","year":1974}],"snapshot_sha256":"6f3bae9e10062f9eb6fb2a5223c13a678c3b4d93f0ff8e7322a38e815be34f4c"},"source":{"id":"2605.13307","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-14T20:29:51.648514Z","id":"4ade3a59-f6ff-4823-8968-01951d46fd90","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Preference fine-tuning outperforms prompting for personalisation but amplifies sycophancy and relationship-seeking, while simulated users recover aggregate rankings yet show far lower self-consistency and different topic and position biases than real humans.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Preference fine-tuning on pooled data nearly matches individual personalization and beats prompting in real-user tests.","strongest_claim":"preference fine-tuning (P-DPO) significantly outperforms both a generic model and personalised prompting but adapting to individual preference data yields marginal gains over training on pooled preferences from a diverse population. Beyond length biases, fine-tuning amplifies sycophancy and relationship-seeking behaviours that people reward in short-term evaluations but which may introduce deleterious long-term consequences.","weakest_assumption":"That preferences collected two years earlier remain stable enough to serve as ground truth for current personalisation, and that blinded multi-turn conversations isolate the effects of fine-tuning versus prompting without confounding factors such as conversation length or topic selection."}},"verdict_id":"4ade3a59-f6ff-4823-8968-01951d46fd90"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:cf0c44eadc010ff684f2f6ffdf59649610b31b7a40c7b79fb7bd78ca63ee2be8","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"a7c650be4e82594d7f65d4f09eba4ef0a2bee9b4838484604b0e1cb3d49763c9","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.HC"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T10:21:14Z","title_canon_sha256":"73adfa24b97a1fde99fddce2b7912ea201be3a8a66572b64f027e86771c922cf"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.13307","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"5d8cdeff7bf13f69f48ff92310252ddd2c4ef2f92e5b4df332d6d0db8ed1ded2","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"5d8cdeff7bf13f69f48ff92310252ddd2c4ef2f92e5b4df332d6d0db8ed1ded2","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48.931840Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48.931840Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"h5CR680Q2CkIszH2GLKEDX+Gd2cDiO0TsLnFVKrfvVxRZeYYmIsga7Fxup+r6rLP6vNQkUJhbgoGsk2PJWPTBA==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:48.932334Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.13307","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:cf0c44eadc010ff684f2f6ffdf59649610b31b7a40c7b79fb7bd78ca63ee2be8","sha256:e2cf787f28df3dbaa4c0ec440acc76a2b3fee223ece00395833fcc376ee2d4b8"],"state_sha256":"0f88a91b2309b24cc602a378a092c4ad7a5e74879d79806688e1820e048b4590"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"099WyClZyHO+kgzrI3SKbyk1uwwu/lwdTWqmmedmcOI0UXVg7t3ssLcokld1BAgCwpgMn5GsJq9RwzlJgtgyAA==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-06-03T06:08:20.141793Z","bundle_sha256":"829554c5bf0bcb9ba4629f4efd769add6f54e860609feb0adbe6f90b82e99019"}}