{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC","short_pith_number":"pith:M2MLDZJG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6698b1e526ed226f34ca36faf4d3b9b899a4152035a84929d25c9ff44383da9a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2309.05898","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Strategic Behavior of Large Language Models: Game Structure vs. Contextual Framing","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.HC","econ.TH"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Babak Heydari, Nunzio Lor\\`e","submitted_at":"2023-09-12T00:54:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper investigates the strategic decision-making capabilities of three Large Language Models (LLMs): GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and LLaMa-2, within the framework of game theory. Utilizing four canonical two-player games -- Prisoner's Dilemma, Stag Hunt, Snowdrift, and Prisoner's Delight -- we explore how these models navigate social dilemmas, situations where players can either cooperate for a collective benefit or defect for individual gain. Crucially, we extend our analysis to examine the role of contextual framing, such as diplomatic relations or casual friendships, in shaping the models' decisio"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2309.05898","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2023-09-12T00:54:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.HC","econ.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"d704aa23d83d40d9e21b5d4eac66817d6f2a45b66bb0945575c53a0889ba0617","abstract_canon_sha256":"db3fb648f1a17f2fbe8bef09c0308016078c7c7a2a22e7d1a44bd7e3bdf8ab92"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.382243Z","signature_b64":"zNkeJIe/a7TTdMvw2txdhD/QhmOCj0EDdxLIuP07NOgoOJXh43PULJ6SC1DRjmve3QJ3JPTCXC4LWMfmWUIkCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6698b1e526ed226f34ca36faf4d3b9b899a4152035a84929d25c9ff44383da9a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.381769Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.381769Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Strategic Behavior of Large Language Models: Game Structure vs. Contextual Framing","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.HC","econ.TH"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Babak Heydari, Nunzio Lor\\`e","submitted_at":"2023-09-12T00:54:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper investigates the strategic decision-making capabilities of three Large Language Models (LLMs): GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and LLaMa-2, within the framework of game theory. Utilizing four canonical two-player games -- Prisoner's Dilemma, Stag Hunt, Snowdrift, and Prisoner's Delight -- we explore how these models navigate social dilemmas, situations where players can either cooperate for a collective benefit or defect for individual gain. Crucially, we extend our analysis to examine the role of contextual framing, such as diplomatic relations or casual friendships, in shaping the models' decisio"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2309.05898","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2309.05898/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2309.05898","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.381829+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2309.05898v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.381829+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2309.05898","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.381829+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"M2MLDZJG5URG","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.381829+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"M2MLDZJG5URG6NGK","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.381829+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"M2MLDZJG","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.381829+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":5,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.17459","citing_title":"Can LLMs Be CEOs? Benchmarking Strategic Resource Reallocation with Multi-Role Agent Simulation","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07790","citing_title":"Byzantine Cheap Talk: Adversarial Resilience and Topology Effects in LLM Coordination Games","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23953","citing_title":"Game-Theoretic Modeling of Heterogeneous Investor Interactions for Stock Price Forecasting","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19260","citing_title":"Understanding the Mechanism of Altruism in Large Language Models","ref_index":258,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11840","citing_title":"Diversity Without Fidelity: A Solver-Sampler Mismatch in Multi-Agent LLM Negotiation Simulation","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/M2MLDZJG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/M2MLDZJG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2309.05898&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/M2MLDZJG5URG6NGKG35PJU5ZXC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.381829+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:48.381829+00:00"}