{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE","short_pith_number":"pith:M2OGISRK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"669c644a2a53de75d7929a9010b332812512a4fd68b8f13b99e793609ebc1ed5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1808.09010","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Small-$x$ Helicity Evolution: an Operator Treatment","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["nucl-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Matthew D. Sievert, Yuri V. Kovchegov","submitted_at":"2018-08-27T19:37:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"We rederive the small-$x$ evolution equations governing quark helicity distribution in a proton using solely an operator-based approach. In our previous works on the subject, the evolution equations were derived using a mix of diagrammatic and operator-based methods. In this work, we re-derive the double-logarithmic small-$x$ evolution equations for quark helicity in terms of the \"polarized Wilson lines\", the operators consisting of light-cone Wilson lines with one or two non-eikonal local operator insertions which bring in helicity dependence. For the first time we give explicit and complete "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1808.09010","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2018-08-27T19:37:07Z","cross_cats_sorted":["nucl-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"3c2de3c34e495def69add49bbc54f3dd064d2a90c5703606c2b3f8f918e0f311","abstract_canon_sha256":"3bf94800514a35ca1462a8008b08a097fbe6a2fca135673d2ff84f97845019fd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:49:43.117142Z","signature_b64":"3foeX0jC83P82xB++xCegBTdZDktKR256hbykrIxFEp552FdaVb1HtFaML6Q4SooX1vKrUL6r+l3376bBzzlAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"669c644a2a53de75d7929a9010b332812512a4fd68b8f13b99e793609ebc1ed5","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:49:43.116529Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:49:43.116529Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Small-$x$ Helicity Evolution: an Operator Treatment","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["nucl-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Matthew D. Sievert, Yuri V. Kovchegov","submitted_at":"2018-08-27T19:37:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"We rederive the small-$x$ evolution equations governing quark helicity distribution in a proton using solely an operator-based approach. In our previous works on the subject, the evolution equations were derived using a mix of diagrammatic and operator-based methods. In this work, we re-derive the double-logarithmic small-$x$ evolution equations for quark helicity in terms of the \"polarized Wilson lines\", the operators consisting of light-cone Wilson lines with one or two non-eikonal local operator insertions which bring in helicity dependence. For the first time we give explicit and complete "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1808.09010","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1808.09010","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:49:43.116609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1808.09010v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:49:43.116609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1808.09010","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:49:43.116609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"M2OGISRKKPPH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"M2OGISRKKPPHLV4S","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"M2OGISRK","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:37.024351+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":7,"internal_anchor_count":6,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00439","citing_title":"Sub-eikonal stress and model dependence of the small-$x$ gluon D-term","ref_index":84,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.17596","citing_title":"Energy Correlators Resolving Proton Spin","ref_index":178,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.17454","citing_title":"Nuclear Cold QCD: Review and Future Strategy","ref_index":270,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.10086","citing_title":"Unpolarized GPDs at small $x$ and non-zero skewness","ref_index":69,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.23428","citing_title":"Sub-eikonal Structure of High-Energy Deep-Inelastic Scattering","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2103.05419","citing_title":"Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report","ref_index":95,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.24629","citing_title":"On the Two $R$-Factors in the Small-$x$ Shockwave Formalism","ref_index":76,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/M2OGISRK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/M2OGISRK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1808.09010&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/M2OGISRKKPPHLV4STKIBBMZSQE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:49:43.116609+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:49:43.116609+00:00"}