{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE","short_pith_number":"pith:M2USF42D","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"66a922f3437b6054b4e63cfb365488b9111a0995496a228a1bdafd193ea3ab50","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.21611","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Disturbing news about the $d=2+\\epsilon$ expansion","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.stat-mech","cond-mat.str-el"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Fabiana De Cesare, Slava Rychkov","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T18:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"The $O(N)$ Non-Linear Sigma Model (NLSM) in $d=2+\\epsilon$ has long been conjectured to describe the same conformal field theory (CFT) as the Wilson-Fisher (WF) $O(N)$ fixed point obtained from the $\\lambda(\\phi^2)^2$ model in $d=4-\\epsilon$. In this work, we put this conjecture into question, building on the recent observation [Jones (2024)] that the NLSM CFT possesses a protected operator with dimension $N-1$, which is instead absent in the WF $O(N)$ CFT. We investigate the possibility of lifting this operator via multiplet recombination - the only known mechanism that could resolve this mis"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.21611","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T18:00:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cond-mat.stat-mech","cond-mat.str-el"],"title_canon_sha256":"02f5e1624d4278955ab10faba379564450ed96229f4cee47366dc775e77f3229","abstract_canon_sha256":"322bc3c234a1806b3665dee49a8ff38f5aac0c455171fb483faa17e145591a05"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.501074Z","signature_b64":"7+8jqMzQzZN05noWlUadsIHL0uhACRF5XC0A85XkYTUoIr4mF93jKj4jpTFAA5a50XfHMdHRwqUoN7H741p6Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"66a922f3437b6054b4e63cfb365488b9111a0995496a228a1bdafd193ea3ab50","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.500576Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.500576Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Disturbing news about the $d=2+\\epsilon$ expansion","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.stat-mech","cond-mat.str-el"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Fabiana De Cesare, Slava Rychkov","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T18:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"The $O(N)$ Non-Linear Sigma Model (NLSM) in $d=2+\\epsilon$ has long been conjectured to describe the same conformal field theory (CFT) as the Wilson-Fisher (WF) $O(N)$ fixed point obtained from the $\\lambda(\\phi^2)^2$ model in $d=4-\\epsilon$. In this work, we put this conjecture into question, building on the recent observation [Jones (2024)] that the NLSM CFT possesses a protected operator with dimension $N-1$, which is instead absent in the WF $O(N)$ CFT. We investigate the possibility of lifting this operator via multiplet recombination - the only known mechanism that could resolve this mis"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.21611","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.21611/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.21611","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.500632+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.21611v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.500632+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.21611","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.500632+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"M2USF42DPNQF","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.500632+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"M2USF42DPNQFJNHG","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.500632+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"M2USF42D","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.500632+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16119","citing_title":"Boundary anomalous dimensions from BCFT: $\\phi^{3}$ theories with a boundary and higher-derivative generalizations","ref_index":42,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.09977","citing_title":"Does hot QCD have a conformal manifold in the chiral limit?","ref_index":96,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15420","citing_title":"Local CFTs extremise $F$","ref_index":126,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/M2USF42D"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/M2USF42D","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.21611&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/M2USF42DPNQFJNHGHT5TMVEIXE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.500632+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:07:38.500632+00:00"}