{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS","short_pith_number":"pith:M3P3UN2W","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"66dfba37569ad924517600f572d53ac4a57876edf61462da1c1bedd7423c3046","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2104.06598","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"AR-LSAT: Investigating Analytical Reasoning of Text","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Daya Guo, Duyu Tang, Jiahai Wang, Jian Yin, Ming Zhou, Nan Duan, Siyuan Wang, Wanjun Zhong, Zenan Xu","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T02:53:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"Analytical reasoning is an essential and challenging task that requires a system to analyze a scenario involving a set of particular circumstances and perform reasoning over it to make conclusions. In this paper, we study the challenge of analytical reasoning of text and introduce a new dataset consisting of questions from the Law School Admission Test from 1991 to 2016. We analyze what knowledge understanding and reasoning abilities are required to do well on this task. Furthermore, to address this reasoning challenge, we design two different baselines: (1) a Transformer-based method which le"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2104.06598","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T02:53:32Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"8570894c10836ee01115be1f23851b38167abb1d8382f8a85138e20df9196403","abstract_canon_sha256":"3fe0fd7574d9269b61d2c0793ec18b448cf71fbe3be5b20daec2056a5f6d1bb4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059775Z","signature_b64":"z9p07hNDoumKsO/x/tD7IVxG/x1XBg94VX8Jyg7Nj7xb26jsuMOCC1SdWt9MGhkjlCPDqbtLs/efEQXk88w4Bw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"66dfba37569ad924517600f572d53ac4a57876edf61462da1c1bedd7423c3046","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059121Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059121Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"AR-LSAT: Investigating Analytical Reasoning of Text","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Daya Guo, Duyu Tang, Jiahai Wang, Jian Yin, Ming Zhou, Nan Duan, Siyuan Wang, Wanjun Zhong, Zenan Xu","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T02:53:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"Analytical reasoning is an essential and challenging task that requires a system to analyze a scenario involving a set of particular circumstances and perform reasoning over it to make conclusions. In this paper, we study the challenge of analytical reasoning of text and introduce a new dataset consisting of questions from the Law School Admission Test from 1991 to 2016. We analyze what knowledge understanding and reasoning abilities are required to do well on this task. Furthermore, to address this reasoning challenge, we design two different baselines: (1) a Transformer-based method which le"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2104.06598","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2104.06598/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2104.06598","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2104.06598v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2104.06598","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"M3P3UN2WTLMS","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"M3P3UN2WTLMSIULW","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059201+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"M3P3UN2W","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059201+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.14516","citing_title":"Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results","ref_index":107,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08471","citing_title":"More Yap Less Meaning: Uncovering Self-Improvement Behavior in SLMs","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.06635","citing_title":"How Language Models Fail: Token-Level Signatures of Committed and Persistent Reasoning Failures","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08755","citing_title":"LAQuant: A Simple Overhead-free Large Reasoning Model Quantization by Layer-wise Lookahead Loss","ref_index":62,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/M3P3UN2W"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/M3P3UN2W","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2104.06598&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/M3P3UN2WTLMSIULWAD2XFVJ2YS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059201+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:17.059201+00:00"}