{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5","short_pith_number":"pith:M7PX4Y72","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"67df7e63fac081892a8048a60a925b3f45da3af4158acc5ef9d0b94b1f089a71","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.05248","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LLMs with Personalities in Multi-issue Negotiation Games","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Ho-Chun Herbert Chang, Sean Noh","submitted_at":"2024-05-08T17:51:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Powered by large language models (LLMs), AI agents have become capable of many human tasks. Using the most canonical definitions of the Big Five personality, we measure the ability of LLMs to negotiate within a game-theoretical framework, as well as methodological challenges to measuring notions of fairness and risk. Simulations (n=1,500) for both single-issue and multi-issue negotiation reveal increase in domain complexity with asymmetric issue valuations improve agreement rates but decrease surplus from aggressive negotiation. Through gradient-boosted regression and Shapley explainers, we fi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.05248","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-05-08T17:51:53Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.MA"],"title_canon_sha256":"dd52bbd867991ba9f16f2ae1ddd33f3575173121ab38c16fcf2ce2e31516c153","abstract_canon_sha256":"2556114a036c5e63f98c5ffec3559e01a45061baf1a3493a72100ae773614527"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.737038Z","signature_b64":"nABmrKLyC5mBdXzt/dqt/xJaHzrlkjFb9RiGW69oX+x/r01XPrTtoe+nYCrAS12M5PwegJMXLf7MxPnknd4EDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"67df7e63fac081892a8048a60a925b3f45da3af4158acc5ef9d0b94b1f089a71","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.736598Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.736598Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LLMs with Personalities in Multi-issue Negotiation Games","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Ho-Chun Herbert Chang, Sean Noh","submitted_at":"2024-05-08T17:51:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Powered by large language models (LLMs), AI agents have become capable of many human tasks. Using the most canonical definitions of the Big Five personality, we measure the ability of LLMs to negotiate within a game-theoretical framework, as well as methodological challenges to measuring notions of fairness and risk. Simulations (n=1,500) for both single-issue and multi-issue negotiation reveal increase in domain complexity with asymmetric issue valuations improve agreement rates but decrease surplus from aggressive negotiation. Through gradient-boosted regression and Shapley explainers, we fi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.05248","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.05248/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.05248","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.736659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.05248v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.736659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.05248","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.736659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"M7PX4Y72YCAY","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.736659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUA","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.736659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"M7PX4Y72","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.736659+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.16772","citing_title":"Assessing Social Alignment: Do Personality-Prompted Large Language Models Behave Like Humans?","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/M7PX4Y72"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/M7PX4Y72","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.05248&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/M7PX4Y72YCAYSKUAJCTAVES3H5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.736659+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:15.736659+00:00"}