{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ","short_pith_number":"pith:MAZPC4R6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6032f1723e5844f716377bb1f89b628c311de82840b8c952b92db4e9a75096b7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.16899","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Prompting or Fine-tuning? Exploring Large Language Models for Causal Graph Validation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Nina Holsmoelle, Yuni Susanti","submitted_at":"2024-05-29T09:06:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study explores the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to evaluate causality in causal graphs generated by conventional statistical causal discovery methods-a task traditionally reliant on manual assessment by human subject matter experts. To bridge this gap in causality assessment, LLMs are employed to evaluate the causal relationships by determining whether a causal connection between variable pairs can be inferred from textual context. Our study compares two approaches: (1) prompting-based method for zero-shot and few-shot causal inference and, (2) fine-tuning language models fo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.16899","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-05-29T09:06:18Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"e2ec18ca7d30ba41a0c69c02a514b64fae43be994ee1e5031f25a737f7cca022","abstract_canon_sha256":"0109a0a6c2b81ae7a8e62622740c806d82bba024031d8c7dc49194ebead5e0a4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.783096Z","signature_b64":"Chr5BMBWGAgH4X1v6e7iCfsxUQC68872nmValYlQSYUy1faWGWXh4gQxqyosQzyqpnKAYjbkQPiedweMZhVoBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6032f1723e5844f716377bb1f89b628c311de82840b8c952b92db4e9a75096b7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.782633Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.782633Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Prompting or Fine-tuning? Exploring Large Language Models for Causal Graph Validation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Nina Holsmoelle, Yuni Susanti","submitted_at":"2024-05-29T09:06:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study explores the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to evaluate causality in causal graphs generated by conventional statistical causal discovery methods-a task traditionally reliant on manual assessment by human subject matter experts. To bridge this gap in causality assessment, LLMs are employed to evaluate the causal relationships by determining whether a causal connection between variable pairs can be inferred from textual context. Our study compares two approaches: (1) prompting-based method for zero-shot and few-shot causal inference and, (2) fine-tuning language models fo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.16899","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.16899/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.16899","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.782687+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.16899v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.782687+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.16899","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.782687+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MAZPC4R6LBCP","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.782687+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRX","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.782687+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MAZPC4R6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.782687+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.11600","citing_title":"GraphRAG-Causal: A novel graph-augmented framework for causal reasoning and annotation in news","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MAZPC4R6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MAZPC4R6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.16899&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MAZPC4R6LBCPOFRXPOY7RG3CRQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.782687+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:06.782687+00:00"}