{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ","short_pith_number":"pith:MB7NZAXC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"607edc82e294aac2df86ff68151349ca7efc085412f4206d48e8c75f85c0508f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.00076","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Robustness of AI-Image Detectors: Fundamental Limits and Practical Attacks","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Aounon Kumar, Atoosa Chegini, Keivan Rezaei, Mehrdad Saberi, Soheil Feizi, Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Wenxiao Wang","submitted_at":"2023-09-29T18:30:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"In light of recent advancements in generative AI models, it has become essential to distinguish genuine content from AI-generated one to prevent the malicious usage of fake materials as authentic ones and vice versa. Various techniques have been introduced for identifying AI-generated images, with watermarking emerging as a promising approach. In this paper, we analyze the robustness of various AI-image detectors including watermarking and classifier-based deepfake detectors. For watermarking methods that introduce subtle image perturbations (i.e., low perturbation budget methods), we reveal a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.00076","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2023-09-29T18:30:29Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2a00a2ac2f6f38800ee196a7d3055d2944a141dc387a9ff5e37db9e73e3806d3","abstract_canon_sha256":"7a97072eba466028281b702af0e39a9bd24b0e9d5b3f6367bb2eb3f1865144b7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720505Z","signature_b64":"rWuEs4qU6R1olFJHnmbx9KZCb/o0rANqq0ATN6Vqw57v6c0c8uvHdtZjvrDbO0/oS9XjtMfWVqMlzHEtAuc8AA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"607edc82e294aac2df86ff68151349ca7efc085412f4206d48e8c75f85c0508f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720097Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720097Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Robustness of AI-Image Detectors: Fundamental Limits and Practical Attacks","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Aounon Kumar, Atoosa Chegini, Keivan Rezaei, Mehrdad Saberi, Soheil Feizi, Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Wenxiao Wang","submitted_at":"2023-09-29T18:30:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"In light of recent advancements in generative AI models, it has become essential to distinguish genuine content from AI-generated one to prevent the malicious usage of fake materials as authentic ones and vice versa. Various techniques have been introduced for identifying AI-generated images, with watermarking emerging as a promising approach. In this paper, we analyze the robustness of various AI-image detectors including watermarking and classifier-based deepfake detectors. For watermarking methods that introduce subtle image perturbations (i.e., low perturbation budget methods), we reveal a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.00076","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.00076/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.00076","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720154+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.00076v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720154+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.00076","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720154+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MB7NZAXCSSVM","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720154+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720154+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MB7NZAXC","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720154+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16720","citing_title":"Compositional Adversarial Training for Robust Visual Watermarking","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.02378","citing_title":"Authenticated Contradictions from Desynchronized Provenance and Watermarking","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09646","citing_title":"\"Training robust watermarking model may hurt authentication!'' Exploring and Mitigating the Identity Leakage in Robust Watermarking","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06662","citing_title":"Towards Robust Content Watermarking Against Removal and Forgery Attacks","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MB7NZAXC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MB7NZAXC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.00076&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MB7NZAXCSSVMFX4G75UBKE2JZJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720154+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:56.720154+00:00"}