{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME","short_pith_number":"pith:MGSTAQWL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"61a53042cb83504a99861451e4fa3f610cc5c47f2dc587662ac3dea55767253d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1711.00775","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Paradox about Likelihood Ratios?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex"],"primary_cat":"physics.data-an","authors_text":"Louis Lyons","submitted_at":"2017-11-02T15:06:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider whether the asymptotic distributions for the log-likelihood ratio test statistic are expected to be Gaussian or chi-squared. Two straightforward examples provide insight on the difference."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1711.00775","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.data-an","submitted_at":"2017-11-02T15:06:19Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex"],"title_canon_sha256":"6ec1dba1b8052e3138d0d4df53dc5750f5bae8f50521606705560a538532ef98","abstract_canon_sha256":"6596afb88c11f17888c09d03d6cf0870d17bc68c70077ebaec0cc64a4ca4e644"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:12.854363Z","signature_b64":"iGQa5ayn1WX4oPXMCm66pFnVCYSfoBGJnzktTkg6B+GaFXvKA2xJK5Td2pyT3aG8sQA4+fUcD5dPHFXLARcnAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"61a53042cb83504a99861451e4fa3f610cc5c47f2dc587662ac3dea55767253d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:12.853550Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:12.853550Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Paradox about Likelihood Ratios?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex"],"primary_cat":"physics.data-an","authors_text":"Louis Lyons","submitted_at":"2017-11-02T15:06:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider whether the asymptotic distributions for the log-likelihood ratio test statistic are expected to be Gaussian or chi-squared. Two straightforward examples provide insight on the difference."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1711.00775","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1711.00775","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:12.853688+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1711.00775v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:12.853688+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1711.00775","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:12.853688+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MGSTAQWLQNIE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:31.346846+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMG","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:31.346846+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MGSTAQWL","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:31.346846+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.07698","citing_title":"A Likelihood Ratio Framework for Highly Motivated Subdominant Signals","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MGSTAQWL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MGSTAQWL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1711.00775&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MGSTAQWLQNIEVGMGCRI6J6R7ME/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:12.853688+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:12.853688+00:00"}