{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW","short_pith_number":"pith:MJL3D2NZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6257b1e9b94905d23ee7a6d8e4132b25810b973395899b9348c8a175dae324ab","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.18032","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Mahalanobis++: Improving OOD Detection via Feature Normalization","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CV"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Matthias Hein, Maximilian Mueller","submitted_at":"2025-05-23T15:36:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) examples is an important task for deploying reliable machine learning models in safety-critial applications. While post-hoc methods based on the Mahalanobis distance applied to pre-logit features are among the most effective for ImageNet-scale OOD detection, their performance varies significantly across models. We connect this inconsistency to strong variations in feature norms, indicating severe violations of the Gaussian assumption underlying the Mahalanobis distance estimation. We show that simple $\\ell_2$-normalization of the features mitigates this prob"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.18032","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-05-23T15:36:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CV"],"title_canon_sha256":"1f81701e5cc1987e6ec73f0505d7354a8d171564d0614d09086d97cabfcf6e4d","abstract_canon_sha256":"300309b2b366304299fd0ecad4aee265ba3b23674439a532db387e5ff9ea2385"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655545Z","signature_b64":"A0OfwIrTWETvAnCecH2n8JCP2jjwNlASDSQfqOJUCoSdy9kZMZLX9eWoS1iOhwvp4L2kC4BhWdrHJiWxostRBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6257b1e9b94905d23ee7a6d8e4132b25810b973395899b9348c8a175dae324ab","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655037Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655037Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Mahalanobis++: Improving OOD Detection via Feature Normalization","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CV"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Matthias Hein, Maximilian Mueller","submitted_at":"2025-05-23T15:36:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) examples is an important task for deploying reliable machine learning models in safety-critial applications. While post-hoc methods based on the Mahalanobis distance applied to pre-logit features are among the most effective for ImageNet-scale OOD detection, their performance varies significantly across models. We connect this inconsistency to strong variations in feature norms, indicating severe violations of the Gaussian assumption underlying the Mahalanobis distance estimation. We show that simple $\\ell_2$-normalization of the features mitigates this prob"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.18032","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.18032/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.18032","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.18032v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.18032","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MJL3D2NZJEC5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MJL3D2NZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655098+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.31155","citing_title":"Learning Hyperspherical Time-Frequency Representations for Time-Series Out-of-Distribution Detection","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18988","citing_title":"Surviving the Unseen: Predictive Defense for Novel Multi-Turn Multimodal Attacks","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.26409","citing_title":"Sparsity as a Key: Unlocking New Insights from Latent Structures for Out-of-Distribution Detection","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MJL3D2NZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MJL3D2NZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.18032&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MJL3D2NZJEC5EPXHU3MOIEZLEW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655098+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:35.655098+00:00"}