{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2","short_pith_number":"pith:MLDY52N5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"62c78ee9bd121eb67c4e0a3c33a0cf36a3c5a1886b25fa20cbb6c82df443cc58","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.18697","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Agents on the Bench: Large Language Model Based Multi Agent Framework for Trustworthy Digital Justice","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Cong Jiang, Xiaolei Yang","submitted_at":"2024-12-24T23:13:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"The justice system has increasingly employed AI techniques to enhance efficiency, yet limitations remain in improving the quality of decision-making, particularly regarding transparency and explainability needed to uphold public trust in legal AI. To address these challenges, we propose a large language model based multi-agent framework named AgentsBench, which aims to simultaneously improve both efficiency and quality in judicial decision-making. Our approach leverages multiple LLM-driven agents that simulate the collaborative deliberation and decision making process of a judicial bench. We c"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.18697","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-12-24T23:13:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.MA"],"title_canon_sha256":"5617de96aaa6024b5e39e9e868a8c93c2a3c838a2ac1571c9bc19c30edd81053","abstract_canon_sha256":"84e8622b3a5b2f690ed46000eede06429f5061fa90f51b9f147807dcfa532d8d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248832Z","signature_b64":"ojugoLejUx0iGlNKPTSgDJGYqq+viCjHp2CXwA2DkITQ/JHnw0FI2e8IrIYqXbwXi/UBvFO4a2HTSZCMvLVTCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"62c78ee9bd121eb67c4e0a3c33a0cf36a3c5a1886b25fa20cbb6c82df443cc58","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248376Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248376Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Agents on the Bench: Large Language Model Based Multi Agent Framework for Trustworthy Digital Justice","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Cong Jiang, Xiaolei Yang","submitted_at":"2024-12-24T23:13:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"The justice system has increasingly employed AI techniques to enhance efficiency, yet limitations remain in improving the quality of decision-making, particularly regarding transparency and explainability needed to uphold public trust in legal AI. To address these challenges, we propose a large language model based multi-agent framework named AgentsBench, which aims to simultaneously improve both efficiency and quality in judicial decision-making. Our approach leverages multiple LLM-driven agents that simulate the collaborative deliberation and decision making process of a judicial bench. We c"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.18697","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.18697/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.18697","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248442+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.18697v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248442+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.18697","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248442+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MLDY52N5CIPL","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248442+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MLDY52N5CIPLM7CO","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248442+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MLDY52N5","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248442+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.30906","citing_title":"Investigating Multi-Agent Deliberation in Law","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.26530","citing_title":"Which Changes Matter? Towards Trustworthy Legal AI via Relevance-Sensitive Evaluation and Solver-Grounded Reasoning","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MLDY52N5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MLDY52N5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.18697&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MLDY52N5CIPLM7COBI6DHIGPG2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248442+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:09.248442+00:00"}