{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI","short_pith_number":"pith:MMLFCIOG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"63165121c6c660ee85866a816df08312253a88fa3f9c82e26925cb2d5a8407ad","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1908.04748","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Optimal Estimation of Generalized Average Treatment Effects using Kernel Optimal Matching","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.AP","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Michele Santacatterina, Nathan Kallus","submitted_at":"2019-08-13T17:09:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"In causal inference, a variety of causal effect estimands have been studied, including the sample, uncensored, target, conditional, optimal subpopulation, and optimal weighted average treatment effects. Ad-hoc methods have been developed for each estimand based on inverse probability weighting (IPW) and on outcome regression modeling, but these may be sensitive to model misspecification, practical violations of positivity, or both. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we formulate the generalized average treatment effect (GATE) to unify these causal estimands as well as their IPW "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1908.04748","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2019-08-13T17:09:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.AP","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"d44a6a22ac319347aff4dc043759186596b970afa8f05be2347ce9f31deee657","abstract_canon_sha256":"c6fb5b9f96d9655b46351b72a38d3ba7c42b93e2db6e7a3c3b77d4ca72e824c6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.063035Z","signature_b64":"R1djH8XTJ7rns/GiPgh5UP7EO9no0lsD9S9PfKnIN9X2G0iuqTI2rqbCeILkeDEjbtVju6/MqcTiLgUdkLNeAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"63165121c6c660ee85866a816df08312253a88fa3f9c82e26925cb2d5a8407ad","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.062553Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.062553Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Optimal Estimation of Generalized Average Treatment Effects using Kernel Optimal Matching","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.AP","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Michele Santacatterina, Nathan Kallus","submitted_at":"2019-08-13T17:09:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"In causal inference, a variety of causal effect estimands have been studied, including the sample, uncensored, target, conditional, optimal subpopulation, and optimal weighted average treatment effects. Ad-hoc methods have been developed for each estimand based on inverse probability weighting (IPW) and on outcome regression modeling, but these may be sensitive to model misspecification, practical violations of positivity, or both. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we formulate the generalized average treatment effect (GATE) to unify these causal estimands as well as their IPW "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1908.04748","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1908.04748/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1908.04748","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.062609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1908.04748v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.062609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1908.04748","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.062609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MMLFCIOGYZQO","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.062609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMG","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.062609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MMLFCIOG","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.062609+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.06512","citing_title":"Target-Weighted Neyman Allocation: Experimental Design for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Population Shift","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MMLFCIOG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MMLFCIOG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1908.04748&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MMLFCIOGYZQO5BMGNKAW34EDCI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.062609+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:12:53.062609+00:00"}