{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO","short_pith_number":"pith:MN2HIUWV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"63747452d51ae6cc887b5609a2693d4bbf985cddcaf6fe1d0f2a659e941e899c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2205.07038","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Geminga contribution to the cosmic-ray positron excess according to the gamma-ray observations","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ph"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","authors_text":"Guang-Yao Zhou, Hong-Hao Zhang, Qiang Yuan, Zhao-Huan Yu","submitted_at":"2022-05-14T11:11:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"We attempt to interpret the cosmic-ray positron excess by injection from the nearby pulsar Geminga, assuming a two-zone diffusion scenario and an injection spectrum with a low energy cutoff. Since the high energy positrons and electrons from Geminga can induce $\\gamma$ rays via inverse Compton scattering, we take into account the extended $\\gamma$-ray observations around Geminga from HAWC for $\\sim 10$ TeV and from Fermi-LAT for $\\mathcal{O}(10)$ GeV. According to the extended $\\gamma$-ray observation claimed by an analysis of Fermi-LAT data, we find that Geminga could explain the positron exc"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2205.07038","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","submitted_at":"2022-05-14T11:11:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"b46d495c053059250d23fa4fe8196a8d916a25acdd503d567d810d53037b5672","abstract_canon_sha256":"e3fd7c7959e0db8bb554b59b5ee0c4cf68408fca10c1d232a73cea365a5b3107"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276805Z","signature_b64":"aJsC9u6pyCwNatV8zzqqNlWRXYwRYGcN4j073vRNUb3T4+mjHIQvBltX+EYH4BxLrTV7Rm55jHLmdnptaX+tCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"63747452d51ae6cc887b5609a2693d4bbf985cddcaf6fe1d0f2a659e941e899c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276367Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276367Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Geminga contribution to the cosmic-ray positron excess according to the gamma-ray observations","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ph"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","authors_text":"Guang-Yao Zhou, Hong-Hao Zhang, Qiang Yuan, Zhao-Huan Yu","submitted_at":"2022-05-14T11:11:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"We attempt to interpret the cosmic-ray positron excess by injection from the nearby pulsar Geminga, assuming a two-zone diffusion scenario and an injection spectrum with a low energy cutoff. Since the high energy positrons and electrons from Geminga can induce $\\gamma$ rays via inverse Compton scattering, we take into account the extended $\\gamma$-ray observations around Geminga from HAWC for $\\sim 10$ TeV and from Fermi-LAT for $\\mathcal{O}(10)$ GeV. According to the extended $\\gamma$-ray observation claimed by an analysis of Fermi-LAT data, we find that Geminga could explain the positron exc"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2205.07038","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2205.07038/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2205.07038","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276425+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2205.07038v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276425+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2205.07038","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276425+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MN2HIUWVDLTM","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276425+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276425+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MN2HIUWV","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276425+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26597","citing_title":"A Boundary-Consistent Two-Zone Electron Kernel for Distant Pulsar Contributions to Positron Flux and Anisotropy","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2310.16594","citing_title":"Constraining the slow-diffusion zone size and electron injection spectral index for the Geminga pulsar halo","ref_index":59,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MN2HIUWV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MN2HIUWV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2205.07038&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MN2HIUWVDLTMZCD3KYE2E2J5JO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276425+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:00:42.276425+00:00"}