{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV","short_pith_number":"pith:MOKKIHKE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6394a41d44f0f325580d7da5413476c5799c7839fbc98cc0bd53f950682aa9c2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.01888","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conformal Prediction Sets Can Cause Disparate Impact","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Bhargava Kumar, Jesse C. Cresswell, Mouloud Belbahri, Yi Sui","submitted_at":"2024-10-02T18:00:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Conformal prediction is a statistically rigorous method for quantifying uncertainty in models by having them output sets of predictions, with larger sets indicating more uncertainty. However, prediction sets are not inherently actionable; many applications require a single output to act on, not several. To overcome this limitation, prediction sets can be provided to a human who then makes an informed decision. In any such system it is crucial to ensure the fairness of outcomes across protected groups, and researchers have proposed that Equalized Coverage be used as the standard for fairness. B"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.01888","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-10-02T18:00:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"fdfabcc66dcd85d78fb31b7e432acf0cbb35d251bc545ff5dd3bb709df94c195","abstract_canon_sha256":"b15cbb7e720e09fc8ed5335655a6ede72193c2b11fcf4eb7fb261a4d9d126227"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.968170Z","signature_b64":"luKnMkhMmCz5u/GMuJsKHA8m0d4pNeAyKj2giLUq7DKqcMCyng0uOtCo5to76bige0i8Uic+mjupYwokQ9kaCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6394a41d44f0f325580d7da5413476c5799c7839fbc98cc0bd53f950682aa9c2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.967686Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.967686Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conformal Prediction Sets Can Cause Disparate Impact","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Bhargava Kumar, Jesse C. Cresswell, Mouloud Belbahri, Yi Sui","submitted_at":"2024-10-02T18:00:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Conformal prediction is a statistically rigorous method for quantifying uncertainty in models by having them output sets of predictions, with larger sets indicating more uncertainty. However, prediction sets are not inherently actionable; many applications require a single output to act on, not several. To overcome this limitation, prediction sets can be provided to a human who then makes an informed decision. In any such system it is crucial to ensure the fairness of outcomes across protected groups, and researchers have proposed that Equalized Coverage be used as the standard for fairness. B"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.01888","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.01888/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.01888","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.967743+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.01888v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.967743+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.01888","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.967743+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MOKKIHKE6DZS","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.967743+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MOKKIHKE6DZSKWAN","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.967743+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MOKKIHKE","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.967743+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.06081","citing_title":"A Framework for Measuring Appropriate Reliance on Set-Valued AI Advice","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05562","citing_title":"Socio-Conformal Calibration in Complex Survey Data: Marginal Validity Is Not Enough for Subgroup Reliability","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MOKKIHKE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MOKKIHKE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.01888&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MOKKIHKE6DZSKWANPWSUCNDWYV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.967743+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:05.967743+00:00"}