{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W","short_pith_number":"pith:MQ347FTX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6437cf96773c35dd637f4d6013d501e58a9b9e6ba49f842bf723142e863cf1c0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2203.15897","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Calibrated Model Criticism Using Split Predictive Checks","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Jiawei Li, Jonathan H. Huggins","submitted_at":"2022-03-29T20:55:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Checking how well a fitted model explains the data is one of the most fundamental parts of a Bayesian data analysis. However, existing model checking methods suffer from trade-offs between being well-calibrated, automated, and computationally efficient. To overcome these limitations, we propose split predictive checks (SPCs), which combine the ease-of-use and speed of posterior predictive checks with the good calibration properties of predictive checks that rely on model-specific derivations or inference schemes. We develop an asymptotic theory for two types of SPCs: single SPCs and the divide"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2203.15897","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2022-03-29T20:55:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"0a280a42753ab59ab0a0ac58d50818f5b0e7fb7fda964e83f5126706e3403103","abstract_canon_sha256":"325e9699cf9759bd92eb94884109c6d29685d8d194b4d6b6633825e374bdd735"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921899Z","signature_b64":"Mp1WLxks17DWV6XiJnI3FDyp6wt5s7UPP6ibjA723pn8E2+ot342Xchok7NU/yiTZLOnx4idtfDkwEgKIA4ECg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6437cf96773c35dd637f4d6013d501e58a9b9e6ba49f842bf723142e863cf1c0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921429Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921429Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Calibrated Model Criticism Using Split Predictive Checks","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Jiawei Li, Jonathan H. Huggins","submitted_at":"2022-03-29T20:55:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Checking how well a fitted model explains the data is one of the most fundamental parts of a Bayesian data analysis. However, existing model checking methods suffer from trade-offs between being well-calibrated, automated, and computationally efficient. To overcome these limitations, we propose split predictive checks (SPCs), which combine the ease-of-use and speed of posterior predictive checks with the good calibration properties of predictive checks that rely on model-specific derivations or inference schemes. We develop an asymptotic theory for two types of SPCs: single SPCs and the divide"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2203.15897","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2203.15897/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2203.15897","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921487+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2203.15897v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921487+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2203.15897","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921487+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MQ347FTXHQ25","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921487+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MQ347FTXHQ252Y37","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921487+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MQ347FTX","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921487+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.10409","citing_title":"Robust Bayesian Predictive Model Selection using Bregman Divergence","ref_index":104,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06090","citing_title":"Posterior Predictive Checks for Gravitational-wave Populations: Limitations and Improvements","ref_index":128,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MQ347FTX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MQ347FTX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2203.15897&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MQ347FTXHQ252Y37JVQBHVIB4W/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921487+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:21:35.921487+00:00"}