{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2010:MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52","short_pith_number":"pith:MQDSGED6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"640723107e44f1356a30ad93b57456eeb03890642f3fc39a6010c9b242d053c8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1004.4125","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Higher-order QCD perturbation theory in different schemes: From FOPT to CIPT to FAPT","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. P. Bakulev, N. G. Stefanis, S. V. Mikhailov","submitted_at":"2010-04-23T13:13:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Results on the resummation of non-power-series expansions of the Adler function of a scalar, $D_S$, and a vector, $D_V$, correlator are presented within fractional analytic perturbation theory (FAPT). The first observable can be used to determine the decay width $\\Gamma_{H\\to b\\bar{b}}$ of a scalar Higgs boson to a bottom-antibottom pair, while the second one is relevant for the $e^+e^-$ annihilation cross section. The obtained estimates are compared with those from fixed-order (FOPT) and contour-improved perturbation theory (CIPT), working out the differences. We prove that although FAPT and "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1004.4125","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2010-04-23T13:13:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"3bf12c411a240d30629c440e9f29029992cbe301b83b4cfcea2024f72e861fb0","abstract_canon_sha256":"06e15974dc8675b016c85e6ece7a2973d538c0e0e7932b496e975040a93c66fd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T04:37:33.121135Z","signature_b64":"Sq4Nf6D1lhdujVWbg+XbDaoQVn616FHs8g8CUtiaTvAmQ2uf7K7URUBqT49xN70BabmL5daV8rnfdDAM31h7Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"640723107e44f1356a30ad93b57456eeb03890642f3fc39a6010c9b242d053c8","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T04:37:33.120557Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T04:37:33.120557Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Higher-order QCD perturbation theory in different schemes: From FOPT to CIPT to FAPT","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. P. Bakulev, N. G. Stefanis, S. V. Mikhailov","submitted_at":"2010-04-23T13:13:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Results on the resummation of non-power-series expansions of the Adler function of a scalar, $D_S$, and a vector, $D_V$, correlator are presented within fractional analytic perturbation theory (FAPT). The first observable can be used to determine the decay width $\\Gamma_{H\\to b\\bar{b}}$ of a scalar Higgs boson to a bottom-antibottom pair, while the second one is relevant for the $e^+e^-$ annihilation cross section. The obtained estimates are compared with those from fixed-order (FOPT) and contour-improved perturbation theory (CIPT), working out the differences. We prove that although FAPT and "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1004.4125","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1004.4125","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:37:33.120639+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1004.4125v4","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:37:33.120639+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1004.4125","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:37:33.120639+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MQDSGED6ITYT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:10.704358+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:10.704358+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MQDSGED6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:10.704358+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.29803","citing_title":"Perturbative QCD fitting of KEDR and BESIII $e^+e^-$ data for R(s) and $\\alpha_s$ determination","ref_index":64,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06996","citing_title":"Renormalon-based resummation for B(D) Mesons","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MQDSGED6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MQDSGED6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1004.4125&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MQDSGED6ITYTK2RQVWJ3K5CW52/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T04:37:33.120639+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T04:37:33.120639+00:00"}