{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX","short_pith_number":"pith:MQU4FTV4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6429c2cebcce21532acf6ac55d4b4e15ce38977fe9cfac7b2ed43046a685ef11","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2304.05225","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is $f_2(1950)$ the tensor glueball?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Arthur Vereijken, Francesco Giacosa, Milena Piotrowska, Shahriyar Jafarzade","submitted_at":"2023-04-11T13:51:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Glueballs remain an experimentally undiscovered expectation of QCD. Lattice QCD (As well as other theoretical approaches) predicts a spectrum of glueballs, with the tensor ($J^{PC}=2^{++}$) glueball being the second lightest, behind the scalar glueball. Here, using a chiral hadronic model, we compute decay ratios of the tensor glueball into various meson decay channels. We find the tensor glueball to primarily decay into two vector mesons, dominated by $\\rho \\rho $ and $K^*K^*$ channels. These results are compared to experimental data of decay rates of isoscalar tensor mesons. Based on this co"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2304.05225","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2023-04-11T13:51:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c76b4c2826773962189076c1e22c1c911d94a9f051c1ae643d299e110e9bcd4f","abstract_canon_sha256":"bc658a157088d59c7be63db70b21559265cc60d45f72e20a2ec1c1234d4388d3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.374084Z","signature_b64":"7hJtQ8MppuYMuIjRKcGJAozmFebgUSeaZuCTy0JzeRd511rjokMGh7UrCln8FhVDOrzlvt5rTawARe5g079EBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6429c2cebcce21532acf6ac55d4b4e15ce38977fe9cfac7b2ed43046a685ef11","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.373582Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.373582Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is $f_2(1950)$ the tensor glueball?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Arthur Vereijken, Francesco Giacosa, Milena Piotrowska, Shahriyar Jafarzade","submitted_at":"2023-04-11T13:51:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Glueballs remain an experimentally undiscovered expectation of QCD. Lattice QCD (As well as other theoretical approaches) predicts a spectrum of glueballs, with the tensor ($J^{PC}=2^{++}$) glueball being the second lightest, behind the scalar glueball. Here, using a chiral hadronic model, we compute decay ratios of the tensor glueball into various meson decay channels. We find the tensor glueball to primarily decay into two vector mesons, dominated by $\\rho \\rho $ and $K^*K^*$ channels. These results are compared to experimental data of decay rates of isoscalar tensor mesons. Based on this co"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2304.05225","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2304.05225/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2304.05225","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.373643+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2304.05225v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.373643+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2304.05225","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.373643+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MQU4FTV4ZYQV","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.373643+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWP","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.373643+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MQU4FTV4","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.373643+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.15704","citing_title":"Hidden-Strangeness Tetraquarks in the Dynamical Diquark Model","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MQU4FTV4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MQU4FTV4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2304.05225&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MQU4FTV4ZYQVGKWPNLCV2S2OCX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.373643+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:36:33.373643+00:00"}