{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK","short_pith_number":"pith:MSREZ4S5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"64a24cf25d19c4680aaba2bc9e841a828abd3a29fda855f79de2bd16a4d514dd","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.09172","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LOB-Bench: Benchmarking Generative AI for Finance -- an Application to Limit Order Book Data","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CE","q-fin.CP","q-fin.TR"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ani Calinescu, Bidipta Sarkar, Jakob Foerster, Kang Li, Peer Nagy, Sascha Frey, Stefan Zohren, Svitlana Vyetrenko","submitted_at":"2025-02-13T10:56:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"While financial data presents one of the most challenging and interesting sequence modelling tasks due to high noise, heavy tails, and strategic interactions, progress in this area has been hindered by the lack of consensus on quantitative evaluation paradigms. To address this, we present LOB-Bench, a benchmark, implemented in python, designed to evaluate the quality and realism of generative message-by-order data for limit order books (LOB) in the LOBSTER format. Our framework measures distributional differences in conditional and unconditional statistics between generated and real LOB data, "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.09172","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-02-13T10:56:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CE","q-fin.CP","q-fin.TR"],"title_canon_sha256":"4c9ba17bea138c8a063ca06bac26c7e541af1b07a0c283f4302d7923007d0437","abstract_canon_sha256":"402ed9b0ae857d82eaa9af13ea4c286f353603e54ca89dbba709513ba059ce3f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716689Z","signature_b64":"0gi+0BIUTAgUwTLSZC4YaptbLNkPLWzYmlbHF+z9o0aUTbi/VUUYHcbUzZznwinlAD6oP+ZzQYXBafiDHrKfAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"64a24cf25d19c4680aaba2bc9e841a828abd3a29fda855f79de2bd16a4d514dd","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716171Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716171Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LOB-Bench: Benchmarking Generative AI for Finance -- an Application to Limit Order Book Data","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CE","q-fin.CP","q-fin.TR"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ani Calinescu, Bidipta Sarkar, Jakob Foerster, Kang Li, Peer Nagy, Sascha Frey, Stefan Zohren, Svitlana Vyetrenko","submitted_at":"2025-02-13T10:56:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"While financial data presents one of the most challenging and interesting sequence modelling tasks due to high noise, heavy tails, and strategic interactions, progress in this area has been hindered by the lack of consensus on quantitative evaluation paradigms. To address this, we present LOB-Bench, a benchmark, implemented in python, designed to evaluate the quality and realism of generative message-by-order data for limit order books (LOB) in the LOBSTER format. Our framework measures distributional differences in conditional and unconditional statistics between generated and real LOB data, "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.09172","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.09172/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.09172","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716233+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.09172v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716233+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.09172","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716233+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MSREZ4S5DHCG","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716233+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVL","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716233+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MSREZ4S5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716233+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.17011","citing_title":"Predicting Liquidity-Aware Bond Yields using Causal GANs and Deep Reinforcement Learning with LLM Evaluation","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MSREZ4S5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MSREZ4S5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.09172&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MSREZ4S5DHCGQCVLUK6J5BA2QK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716233+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:17.716233+00:00"}