{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU","short_pith_number":"pith:MT5PY342","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"64fafc6f9a28ae3b528cd019a2767e2524a89cd4f1de17283e4147bce8cb9af3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2210.06959","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Matthijs van Leeuwen, Yuxuan Zhu, Zhong Li","submitted_at":"2022-10-13T12:37:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the past two decades, most research on anomaly detection has focused on improving the accuracy of the detection, while largely ignoring the explainability of the corresponding methods and thus leaving the explanation of outcomes to practitioners. As anomaly detection algorithms are increasingly used in safety-critical domains, providing explanations for the high-stakes decisions made in those domains has become an ethical and regulatory requirement. Therefore, this work provides a comprehensive and structured survey on state-of-the-art explainable anomaly detection techniques. We propose a "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2210.06959","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2022-10-13T12:37:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"71269c8112786f1f3dbb5b4f65c584b74ea7857e55c907691acd597bcb0f6dc3","abstract_canon_sha256":"c6df4bc0fd496250246456a46f252f6f487639c642d16aa9cdbec08264de387a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.798406Z","signature_b64":"9xFfZqHY5U1U3ZA2bbRX9oaZ4CapiTFGt445Q3g+fZg4KDnw/5Msv31joWOaQnNjUQqsBnLU6LekbX3ujsARBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"64fafc6f9a28ae3b528cd019a2767e2524a89cd4f1de17283e4147bce8cb9af3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.797859Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.797859Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Matthijs van Leeuwen, Yuxuan Zhu, Zhong Li","submitted_at":"2022-10-13T12:37:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the past two decades, most research on anomaly detection has focused on improving the accuracy of the detection, while largely ignoring the explainability of the corresponding methods and thus leaving the explanation of outcomes to practitioners. As anomaly detection algorithms are increasingly used in safety-critical domains, providing explanations for the high-stakes decisions made in those domains has become an ethical and regulatory requirement. Therefore, this work provides a comprehensive and structured survey on state-of-the-art explainable anomaly detection techniques. We propose a "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2210.06959","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2210.06959/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2210.06959","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.797914+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2210.06959v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.797914+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.06959","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.797914+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MT5PY342FCXD","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.797914+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MT5PY342FCXDWUUM","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.797914+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MT5PY342","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.797914+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00867","citing_title":"Statistical Analysis of using the Shapley Value for Sensor Anomaly Localization with Accurate Classifiers","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.21023","citing_title":"On Using the Shapley Value for Anomaly Localization: A Statistical Investigation","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MT5PY342"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MT5PY342","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2210.06959&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MT5PY342FCXDWUUM2AM2E5T6EU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.797914+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:29:18.797914+00:00"}