{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU","short_pith_number":"pith:MUDNSH64","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6506d91fdcf45df7f0b5d62267e3a57d0b652dfa7bddd6af711c59080be26390","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2103.03223","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of Quantification Methods","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Florian Lemmerich, Markus Strohmaier, Tobias Schumacher","submitted_at":"2021-03-04T18:51:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantification represents the problem of estimating the distribution of class labels on unseen data. It also represents a growing research field in supervised machine learning, for which a large variety of different algorithms has been proposed in recent years. However, a comprehensive empirical comparison of quantification methods that supports algorithm selection is not available yet. In this work, we close this research gap by conducting a thorough empirical performance comparison of 24 different quantification methods on overall more than 40 data sets, considering binary as well as multicl"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2103.03223","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2021-03-04T18:51:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.IR"],"title_canon_sha256":"9ee1251fcc6e16b8d81acf2411ec56eae91043d00abd31b20169e687a8cffb0b","abstract_canon_sha256":"42780b8e73de27e85e10c34c7f29a143c0b9d0efe32451e22c30048d2f08930a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.758530Z","signature_b64":"tjpDQQvsfCivnaG3InNbUU6HdJJCSKa3rDro/HYxVUtkf4EUvFDS/MgbOOm9WJDIkliaJ8rp5Ai+xer0CNVQAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6506d91fdcf45df7f0b5d62267e3a57d0b652dfa7bddd6af711c59080be26390","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.757926Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.757926Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of Quantification Methods","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Florian Lemmerich, Markus Strohmaier, Tobias Schumacher","submitted_at":"2021-03-04T18:51:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantification represents the problem of estimating the distribution of class labels on unseen data. It also represents a growing research field in supervised machine learning, for which a large variety of different algorithms has been proposed in recent years. However, a comprehensive empirical comparison of quantification methods that supports algorithm selection is not available yet. In this work, we close this research gap by conducting a thorough empirical performance comparison of 24 different quantification methods on overall more than 40 data sets, considering binary as well as multicl"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2103.03223","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2103.03223/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2103.03223","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.757997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2103.03223v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.757997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2103.03223","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.757997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MUDNSH646RO7","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.757997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MUDNSH646RO7P4FV","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.757997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MUDNSH64","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.757997+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.06061","citing_title":"Estimating prevalence with precision and accuracy","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MUDNSH64"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MUDNSH64","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2103.03223&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MUDNSH646RO7P4FV2YRGPY5FPU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.757997+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:41.757997+00:00"}