{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A","short_pith_number":"pith:MUQAUUSC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"65200a52428040b84f78fd95406147d024d9e3d1c221ac3a09df649df2e20246","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1906.00285","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combination","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","math.OC"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Angela Zhou, Nathan Kallus, Xiaojie Mao","submitted_at":"2019-06-01T20:32:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"The increasing impact of algorithmic decisions on people's lives compels us to scrutinize their fairness and, in particular, the disparate impacts that ostensibly-color-blind algorithms can have on different groups. Examples include credit decisioning, hiring, advertising, criminal justice, personalized medicine, and targeted policymaking, where in some cases legislative or regulatory frameworks for fairness exist and define specific protected classes. In this paper we study a fundamental challenge to assessing disparate impacts in practice: protected class membership is often not observed in "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1906.00285","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2019-06-01T20:32:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","math.OC"],"title_canon_sha256":"f454d22a7a396232749d8a3d2b1d252a2e6e0f8c1b64d9dcd39d95e0ee885205","abstract_canon_sha256":"3ff244cbf0de1255bd306a87dca64dccbbddb303231962aac4dff053c5c27b1d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980611Z","signature_b64":"4USW6Hy0EHqF+oUkyheVtbotqMIi8hbMO/XEyQJrqKNEWYIwQn7gVCnqz2pypERRMBCsK0dVvdgyMtCMKmvwDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"65200a52428040b84f78fd95406147d024d9e3d1c221ac3a09df649df2e20246","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980142Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980142Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combination","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","math.OC"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Angela Zhou, Nathan Kallus, Xiaojie Mao","submitted_at":"2019-06-01T20:32:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"The increasing impact of algorithmic decisions on people's lives compels us to scrutinize their fairness and, in particular, the disparate impacts that ostensibly-color-blind algorithms can have on different groups. Examples include credit decisioning, hiring, advertising, criminal justice, personalized medicine, and targeted policymaking, where in some cases legislative or regulatory frameworks for fairness exist and define specific protected classes. In this paper we study a fundamental challenge to assessing disparate impacts in practice: protected class membership is often not observed in "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1906.00285","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1906.00285/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1906.00285","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980198+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1906.00285v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980198+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1906.00285","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980198+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MUQAUUSCQBAL","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980198+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980198+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MUQAUUSC","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980198+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2309.07176","citing_title":"Mind the Gap: Optimal and Equitable Encouragement Policies","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MUQAUUSC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MUQAUUSC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1906.00285&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MUQAUUSCQBALQT3Y7WKUAYKH2A/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980198+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:25.980198+00:00"}