{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE","short_pith_number":"pith:MW5Q4YRS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"65bb0e6232fbb643859a66ce2dc4a9592981a0c29124f6ccd7826aa92b81edaf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.14335","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Linearly-Interpretable Concept Embedding Models for Text Analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Danilo Giordano, Francesco De Santis, Gabriele Ciravegna, Philippe Bich, Pietro Barbiero, Tania Cerquitelli","submitted_at":"2024-06-20T14:04:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite their success, Large-Language Models (LLMs) still face criticism due to their lack of interpretability. Traditional post-hoc interpretation methods, based on attention and gradient-based analysis, offer limited insights as they only approximate the model's decision-making processes and have been proved to be unreliable. For this reason, Concept-Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have been lately proposed in the textual field to provide interpretable predictions based on human-understandable concepts. However, CBMs still exhibit several limitations due to their architectural constraints limiting "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.14335","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-06-20T14:04:53Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"faaba7b9bd3bd32882a5aa5983a5706898d322e42d5932fdab7e477dcdd8caa2","abstract_canon_sha256":"96c86e927b3c0c46cc4762870e1645b5c160108251c269d7531d1435947f04a9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533856Z","signature_b64":"c4oBxjj2Eon19NliTH2oZxoc78tii1VVSbh2yrvl6boVY1dAjYR60NjiTqW+THrkL7mOOwQzobC6xl0xxZu7DQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"65bb0e6232fbb643859a66ce2dc4a9592981a0c29124f6ccd7826aa92b81edaf","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533007Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533007Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Linearly-Interpretable Concept Embedding Models for Text Analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Danilo Giordano, Francesco De Santis, Gabriele Ciravegna, Philippe Bich, Pietro Barbiero, Tania Cerquitelli","submitted_at":"2024-06-20T14:04:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite their success, Large-Language Models (LLMs) still face criticism due to their lack of interpretability. Traditional post-hoc interpretation methods, based on attention and gradient-based analysis, offer limited insights as they only approximate the model's decision-making processes and have been proved to be unreliable. For this reason, Concept-Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have been lately proposed in the textual field to provide interpretable predictions based on human-understandable concepts. However, CBMs still exhibit several limitations due to their architectural constraints limiting "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.14335","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.14335/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.14335","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.14335v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.14335","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MW5Q4YRS7O3E","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MW5Q4YRS","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533182+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.20293","citing_title":"Enhancing the Comprehensibility of Text Explanations via Unsupervised Concept Discovery","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MW5Q4YRS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MW5Q4YRS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.14335&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MW5Q4YRS7O3EHBM2M3HC3RFJLE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533182+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:38:00.533182+00:00"}