{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK","short_pith_number":"pith:MWZ7CBLR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"65b3f10571a6d5f0743ffc5478a1ee3a928c64fbacc19438fdcdc7dfe78e9235","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.14202","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Rationale Behind Essay Scores: Enhancing S-LLM's Multi-Trait Essay Scoring with Rationale Generated by LLMs","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bryan Wong, Jongwoo Kim, Munyong Yi, Seongyeub Chu","submitted_at":"2024-10-18T06:35:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Existing automated essay scoring (AES) has solely relied on essay text without using explanatory rationales for the scores, thereby forgoing an opportunity to capture the specific aspects evaluated by rubric indicators in a fine-grained manner. This paper introduces Rationale-based Multiple Trait Scoring (RMTS), a novel approach for multi-trait essay scoring that integrates prompt-engineering-based large language models (LLMs) with a fine-tuning-based essay scoring model using a smaller large language model (S-LLM). RMTS uses an LLM-based trait-wise rationale generation system where a separate"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.14202","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-10-18T06:35:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"8ee6d8453e2260e71e0cc3d9e3ac0ab60f85ede6e859fb9431a08ca83b13ad24","abstract_canon_sha256":"50ba6b51d4fe645d408ce194b606d8058f015d1f4bc13dc5833143a9b1a29eff"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125659Z","signature_b64":"/aNfkCMyIANYYbAryhnlpk7fRsHVbgBYkMP+aoFiia+YrmriRd9yYpV4jB14gQPz/s8CufbbosQfVJHCdWeAAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"65b3f10571a6d5f0743ffc5478a1ee3a928c64fbacc19438fdcdc7dfe78e9235","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125179Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125179Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Rationale Behind Essay Scores: Enhancing S-LLM's Multi-Trait Essay Scoring with Rationale Generated by LLMs","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bryan Wong, Jongwoo Kim, Munyong Yi, Seongyeub Chu","submitted_at":"2024-10-18T06:35:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Existing automated essay scoring (AES) has solely relied on essay text without using explanatory rationales for the scores, thereby forgoing an opportunity to capture the specific aspects evaluated by rubric indicators in a fine-grained manner. This paper introduces Rationale-based Multiple Trait Scoring (RMTS), a novel approach for multi-trait essay scoring that integrates prompt-engineering-based large language models (LLMs) with a fine-tuning-based essay scoring model using a smaller large language model (S-LLM). RMTS uses an LLM-based trait-wise rationale generation system where a separate"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.14202","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.14202/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.14202","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125243+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.14202v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125243+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.14202","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125243+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MWZ7CBLRU3K7","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125243+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B7","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125243+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MWZ7CBLR","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125243+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.14561","citing_title":"Agreement Between Large Language Models and Human Raters in Essay Scoring: A Research Synthesis","ref_index":2024,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MWZ7CBLR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MWZ7CBLR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.14202&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZ7CBLRU3K7A5B77RKHRIPOHK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125243+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:49.125243+00:00"}