{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR","short_pith_number":"pith:MWZBYCNR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"65b21c09b194bc298a32fd526fdb9ba47dbb214e7fb6bf63ffa2651ee04e3bae","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2601.13514","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Post-selection inference for penalized M-estimators via score thinning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Daniela Witten, Ronan Perry, Snigdha Panigrahi","submitted_at":"2026-01-20T02:03:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider inference for M-estimators after model selection using a sparsity-inducing penalty. While existing methods for this task require bespoke inference procedures, we propose a simpler approach, which relies on two insights: (i) adding and subtracting carefully-constructed noise to a Gaussian random variable with unknown mean and known variance leads to two \\emph{independent} Gaussian random variables; and (ii) both the selection event resulting from penalized M-estimation, and the event that a standard (non-selective) confidence interval for an M-estimator covers its target, can be cha"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2601.13514","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2026-01-20T02:03:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"8a88a05995a2aec4d2f5506e4e1e9833e9aeeb365bacf3d8c7d0549173f40bb3","abstract_canon_sha256":"f7a445c606624a6ca4abf194c7e98c8f5c21c990506f2736b6a42283ada19acc"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.167017Z","signature_b64":"5ICM8yOte6MvRIhFCd4pvAvbRdrDu9aT3nvQ+XlfLFrk9pVQX2HFdARyivLGULR8MsBeCu3gL9rOl5dzFz1KAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"65b21c09b194bc298a32fd526fdb9ba47dbb214e7fb6bf63ffa2651ee04e3bae","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.166087Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.166087Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Post-selection inference for penalized M-estimators via score thinning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Daniela Witten, Ronan Perry, Snigdha Panigrahi","submitted_at":"2026-01-20T02:03:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider inference for M-estimators after model selection using a sparsity-inducing penalty. While existing methods for this task require bespoke inference procedures, we propose a simpler approach, which relies on two insights: (i) adding and subtracting carefully-constructed noise to a Gaussian random variable with unknown mean and known variance leads to two \\emph{independent} Gaussian random variables; and (ii) both the selection event resulting from penalized M-estimation, and the event that a standard (non-selective) confidence interval for an M-estimator covers its target, can be cha"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2601.13514","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2601.13514/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2601.13514","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.166529+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2601.13514v2","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.166529+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2601.13514","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.166529+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"MWZBYCNRSS6C","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.166529+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.166529+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"MWZBYCNR","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.166529+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.08089","citing_title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MWZBYCNR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/MWZBYCNR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2601.13514&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/MWZBYCNRSS6CTCRS7VJG7W43UR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.166529+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:28.166529+00:00"}