{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2013:N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ","short_pith_number":"pith:N2A4HCVD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6e81c38aa3d3d9ada3d9d4fcdde535925cbd3b86b72e33033bd1454fd3da9c22","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1306.6427","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is global asymptotic cloning state estimation?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Giulio Chiribella, Yuxiang Yang","submitted_at":"2013-06-27T07:50:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"We pose the question whether the asymptotic equivalence between quantum cloning and quantum state estimation, valid at single-copy level, still holds when all the copies are examined jointly. For an N-to-M cloner, we consider the overall fidelity between the state of the M output systems and the state of M ideal copies, and we ask whether the optimal fidelity is attained by a measure-and- prepare protocol in the limit of large M. In order to gain intuition into the general problem, we analyze two concrete examples: i) cloning qubit states on the equator of the Bloch sphere and ii) cloning two-"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1306.6427","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2013-06-27T07:50:49Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b634f0a280e5398387de3548c7a8ae1bc8d41d20e48986cbdfeca7636f281192","abstract_canon_sha256":"c742f7f9857cb07e02b1d122cbc490d3eac0a23d62b96831c52e970414729568"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:54:48.124196Z","signature_b64":"mIq2ixajKi6KxTBn0GjoUGD1tTtrey2Pj4H6js/QRxUUCL2aMI1EGnPj20CBKhvCE6p1h7+WVaDznvpgmVgMCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6e81c38aa3d3d9ada3d9d4fcdde535925cbd3b86b72e33033bd1454fd3da9c22","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:54:48.123784Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:54:48.123784Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is global asymptotic cloning state estimation?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Giulio Chiribella, Yuxiang Yang","submitted_at":"2013-06-27T07:50:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"We pose the question whether the asymptotic equivalence between quantum cloning and quantum state estimation, valid at single-copy level, still holds when all the copies are examined jointly. For an N-to-M cloner, we consider the overall fidelity between the state of the M output systems and the state of M ideal copies, and we ask whether the optimal fidelity is attained by a measure-and- prepare protocol in the limit of large M. In order to gain intuition into the general problem, we analyze two concrete examples: i) cloning qubit states on the equator of the Bloch sphere and ii) cloning two-"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1306.6427","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1306.6427","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:54:48.123854+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1306.6427v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:54:48.123854+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1306.6427","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:54:48.123854+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"N2A4HCVD2PM2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:52.871228+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:52.871228+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"N2A4HCVD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:52.871228+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21457","citing_title":"An Exponential Sample-Complexity Advantage for Coherent Quantum Inference","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N2A4HCVD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N2A4HCVD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1306.6427&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/N2A4HCVD2PM23I6Z2T6N3ZJVSJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:54:48.123854+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:54:48.123854+00:00"}